AIVI vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AIVI (WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. AIVI is actively managed, while QGRW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AIVI returned 18.69%/yr vs 26.28%/yr for QGRW. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIVI charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

AIVI vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVI achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 9.00% return.

AIVI

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 10.49%
• 1Y: 24.84%
• 3Y*: 18.69%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 9.67%

QGRW

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 9.00%
• 6M: 7.55%
• 1Y: 24.69%
• 3Y*: 26.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVI vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AIVI WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund	10.60%	38.68%	2.07%	18.11%	-1.76%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	9.00%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVI and QGRW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022	0.45

AIVI vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AIVI	QGRW
Financial Services	38.1%	3.7%
Industrials	15.9%	7.6%
Basic Materials	7.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	11.6%
Healthcare	5.5%	4.4%
Energy	5.1%	0.5%
Utilities	4.7%	0.3%
Technology	3.9%	55.0%
Real Estate	3.3%	-
Communication Services	2.6%	16.4%

Return for Risk

AIVI vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVI

AIVI Risk / Return Rank: 59
AIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
AIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 63
AIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
AIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 40
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVI vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIVI	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.33	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	1.84	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.24	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	1.61	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.93	5.97	+1.96

AIVI vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVI and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AIVI vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVI drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVI and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIVI	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.98%	-24.40%	-41.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-15.44%	+4.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.71%	-24.40%	+12.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-6.82%	+5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-3.29%	-12.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	4.14%	-1.00%

Volatility

AIVI vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) is 4.00%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that AIVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIVI	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	7.92%	-3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	15.10%	-3.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.51%	18.64%	-5.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	21.27%	-6.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.16%	21.27%	-5.11%

AIVI vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIVI vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

AIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIVI WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund	5.26%	4.70%	4.94%	5.05%	4.32%	5.53%	3.50%	4.31%	4.21%	3.65%	3.98%	4.23%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIVI and QGRW in my portfolio?

AIVI and QGRW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AIVI or QGRW?

QGRW has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to AIVI (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVI dropped -65.98% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, AIVI or QGRW?

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 26.28% vs 18.69% for AIVI. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, AIVI has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AIVI or QGRW?

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 26.28% return vs 18.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIVI or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for AIVI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIVI or QGRW?

AIVI has the higher dividend yield at 5.26%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between AIVI and QGRW?

AIVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for AIVI and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.