AIVI vs. EFAS
AIVI (WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. AIVI is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIVI returned 10.28%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for EFAS. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIVI charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.
Performance
AIVI vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIVI achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 13.61% return.
AIVI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 23.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
AIVI vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIVI WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund | 10.15% | 38.68% | 2.07% | 18.11% | -9.78% | 9.33% | -1.28% | 17.55% | -9.25% | 20.63% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 13.61% | 46.83% | 3.07% | 14.65% | -8.00% | 12.75% | -5.42% | 14.60% | -11.60% | 22.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIVI and EFAS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AIVI and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
AIVI vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIVI
EFAS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
AIVI
EFAS
Industrials
AIVI
EFAS
Consumer Defensive
AIVI
EFAS
Basic Materials
AIVI
EFAS
Energy
AIVI
EFAS
Utilities
AIVI
EFAS
Consumer Cyclical
AIVI
EFAS
Healthcare
AIVI
EFAS
Technology
AIVI
EFAS
Real Estate
AIVI
EFAS
Communication Services
AIVI
EFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIVI vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
AIVI
EFAS
AIVI vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIVI | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 2.70 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 3.79 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.47 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 5.72 | -3.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 15.34 | -7.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIVI | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.70 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.79 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.56 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
AIVI vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIVI drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVI and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIVI | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.98% | -44.38% | -21.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -5.30% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.71% | -11.84% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.05% | -28.81% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -2.45% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -7.08% | -8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.98% | +1.11% |
Volatility
AIVI vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.08%. This indicates that AIVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIVI | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 3.08% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 8.17% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.31% | 10.67% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 15.59% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 18.33% | -1.86% |
AIVI vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIVI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIVI vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
AIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than EFAS's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIVI WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund | 4.18% | 4.70% | 4.94% | 5.05% | 4.32% | 5.53% | 3.50% | 4.31% | 4.21% | 3.65% | 3.98% | 4.23% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.59% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIVI and EFAS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIVI has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to EFAS (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVI dropped -65.98% vs EFAS's -44.38%.
On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 12.25% vs 10.28% for AIVI. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 12.25% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for AIVI.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 4.18% for AIVI.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for AIVI and 0.56% for EFAS.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIVI and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer