PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVI vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVI vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVI achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.


AIVI

1D
0.52%
1M
1.80%
YTD
9.99%
6M
13.68%
1Y
23.85%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
8.60%

ICOW

1D
0.00%
1M
1.48%
YTD
17.35%
6M
18.03%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVI vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVI
WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund
9.99%38.68%2.07%18.11%-9.78%9.33%-1.28%17.55%-9.25%7.12%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
17.35%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%17.91%-16.09%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVI and ICOW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.85

The correlation between AIVI and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIVI vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVI
ICOW

Financial Services

39.3%

-

Industrials

16.1%
28.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
8.5%

Basic Materials

6.7%
5.4%

Energy

5.6%
23.7%

Utilities

5.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
11.6%

Healthcare

5.2%
7.1%

Technology

3.3%
6.2%

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Communication Services

2.9%
8.9%

Financial Services

AIVI
39.3%
ICOW

-

Industrials

AIVI
16.1%
ICOW
28.7%

Consumer Defensive

AIVI
7.2%
ICOW
8.5%

Basic Materials

AIVI
6.7%
ICOW
5.4%

Energy

AIVI
5.6%
ICOW
23.7%

Utilities

AIVI
5.4%
ICOW

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIVI
5.2%
ICOW
11.6%

Healthcare

AIVI
5.2%
ICOW
7.1%

Technology

AIVI
3.3%
ICOW
6.2%

Real Estate

AIVI
3.1%
ICOW

-

Communication Services

AIVI
2.9%
ICOW
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVI vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVI
AIVI Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVI vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIVIICOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.50

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

4.87

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

17.40

-9.69

AIVI vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVI and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIVIICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.85

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.61

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.55

-0.31

Drawdowns

AIVI vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVI drawdown since its inception was -65.98%, which is greater than ICOW's maximum drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVI and ICOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVIICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.98%

-43.49%

-22.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-8.02%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.71%

-14.81%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

-28.48%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-0.63%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.53%

-7.58%

-7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.24%

+0.86%

Volatility

AIVI vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVI) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) have volatilities of 4.04% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVIICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.99%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

10.58%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

13.72%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

16.64%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

18.46%

-1.99%

AIVI vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVI vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

AIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than ICOW's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVI
WisdomTree International Al Enhanced Value Fund
4.19%4.70%4.94%5.05%4.32%5.53%3.50%4.31%4.21%3.65%3.98%4.23%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.71%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVI and ICOW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVI has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to ICOW (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVI dropped -65.98% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 10.06% for AIVI. On fees, AIVI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

AIVI has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 2.71% for ICOW.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for AIVI and 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVI and ICOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer