AIQ vs. FLTR
AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AIQ returned 17.07%/yr vs 4.53%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AIQ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
AIQ vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 26.48% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 2.11% return.
AIQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 26.48%
- 6M
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 53.73%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.07%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 3.50%
AIQ vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 26.48% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.11% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIQ and FLTR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIQ vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
AIQ
FLTR
AIQ vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIQ | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 3.10 | -1.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 17.09 | -13.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 100.68 | -90.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIQ vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIQ | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.66% | -17.84% | -26.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.47% | -0.31% | -16.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -1.93% | -24.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.66% | -3.06% | -41.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.28% | -0.08% | -8.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -0.67% | -9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 0.05% | +5.01% |
Volatility
AIQ vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 13.58% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.29%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIQ | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.58% | 0.29% | +13.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.73% | 0.65% | +21.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.69% | 0.80% | +24.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 2.13% | +23.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.75% | 5.00% | +20.75% |
AIQ vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIQ vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIQ and FLTR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (13.58%) compared to FLTR (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 17.07% vs 4.53% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 17.07% return vs 4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.15% for AIQ.
AIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.68 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIQ and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer