PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AII.TO vs. XRH0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AII.TO vs. XRH0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AII.TO is traded in CAD, while XRH0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XRH0.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 94.37% return, which is significantly higher than XRH0.L's -25.47% return. Over the past 10 years, AII.TO has outperformed XRH0.L with an annualized return of 48.01%, while XRH0.L has yielded a comparatively lower 28.50% annualized return.


AII.TO

1D
2.40%
1M
-14.19%
YTD
94.37%
6M
93.56%
1Y
132.74%
3Y*
196.50%
5Y*
71.64%
10Y*
48.01%

XRH0.L

1D
1.68%
1M
-7.83%
YTD
-25.47%
6M
-20.94%
1Y
46.02%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
-12.84%
10Y*
28.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AII.TO vs. XRH0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
94.37%784.25%68.52%-20.59%-23.60%39.06%52.38%-35.38%18.18%103.70%
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
-25.47%191.29%-7.47%-61.74%1.59%-15.55%176.49%123.24%58.69%86.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and XRH0.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2011

0.00

The correlation between AII.TO and XRH0.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AII.TO vs. XRH0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO
AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

XRH0.L
XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AII.TO vs. XRH0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AII.TOXRH0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.15

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

2.13

+2.94

AII.TO vs. XRH0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and XRH0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. XRH0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, smaller than the maximum XRH0.L drawdown of -85.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and XRH0.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AII.TOXRH0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.14%

-85.17%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.79%

-39.89%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.79%

-43.80%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.43%

-79.89%

+20.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-85.17%

+16.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.85%

-63.42%

+36.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.47%

-46.06%

+12.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.31%

21.58%

+4.73%

Volatility

AII.TO vs. XRH0.L - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a higher volatility of 31.36% compared to Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) at 28.15%. This indicates that AII.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRH0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AII.TOXRH0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.36%

28.15%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.35%

70.26%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.99%

89.57%

+9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.65%

69.12%

+5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.28%

66.96%

+8.32%

Dividends

AII.TO vs. XRH0.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AII.TO nor XRH0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AII.TO and XRH0.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AII.TO and XRH0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer