AII.TO vs. MNS.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AII.TO (Almonty Industries Inc.) is a stock, while MNS.TO (Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves) is Silver fund tracking the N/A (Physical Bullion). Over the past 10 years, AII.TO returned 49.66%/yr vs 16.36%/yr for MNS.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AII.TO vs. MNS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 138.19% return, which is significantly higher than MNS.TO's -7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, AII.TO has outperformed MNS.TO with an annualized return of 49.66%, while MNS.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 16.36% annualized return.

AII.TO

• 1D: 3.45%
• 1M: 5.31%
• YTD: 138.19%
• 6M: 186.35%
• 1Y: 512.35%
• 3Y*: 215.55%
• 5Y*: 72.09%
• 10Y*: 49.66%

MNS.TO

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: -7.39%
• 6M: 23.60%
• 1Y: 105.40%
• 3Y*: 48.59%
• 5Y*: 23.53%
• 10Y*: 16.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AII.TO vs. MNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AII.TO Almonty Industries Inc.	138.19%	784.25%	68.52%	-20.59%	-23.60%	39.06%	52.38%	-35.38%	18.18%	103.70%
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves	-7.39%	161.12%	41.73%	-5.85%	5.27%	-15.46%	45.70%	9.85%	-1.65%	-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and MNS.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2012	0.07

Over the past year, AII.TO and MNS.TO have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

AII.TO vs. MNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO

AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

MNS.TO

MNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 51
MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AII.TO vs. MNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AII.TO	MNS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.60	1.96	+3.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	2.10	+2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.36	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.87	2.77	+9.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.42	6.11	+19.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AII.TO vs. MNS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.60, which is higher than the MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and MNS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AII.TO	MNS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.60	1.96	+3.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	0.72	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.56	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.29	-0.28

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. MNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, which is greater than MNS.TO's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and MNS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AII.TO	MNS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.14%	-51.12%	-29.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.53%	-38.31%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.53%	-38.31%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.14%	-38.31%	-27.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.52%	-42.02%	-26.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.35%	-31.23%	+20.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.09%	-28.15%	-4.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.29%	17.30%	+2.99%

Volatility

AII.TO vs. MNS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a higher volatility of 24.60% compared to Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) at 15.53%. This indicates that AII.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AII.TO	MNS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.60%	15.53%	+9.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.44%	52.09%	+12.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.30%	54.04%	+38.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.19%	34.67%	+33.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.25%	32.04%	+40.21%

Dividends

AII.TO vs. MNS.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AII.TO nor MNS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AII.TO and MNS.TO in my portfolio?

AII.TO and MNS.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.