AII.TO vs. BE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE).

Performance

AII.TO vs. BE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AII.TO vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AII.TO Almonty Industries Inc.	73.24%	784.25%	68.52%	-20.59%	-23.60%	39.06%	52.38%	-35.38%	-30.11%
BE Bloom Energy Corporation	54.37%	273.28%	62.96%	-24.30%	-6.60%	-24.17%	277.18%	-28.83%	-58.24%

Different Trading Currencies

AII.TO is traded in CAD, while BE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap AII.TO : CA$5.49B BE : $34.92B
EPS AII.TO : -CA$0.75 BE : -$0.36
PS Ratio AII.TO : 139.19 BE : 15.95
PB Ratio AII.TO : 15.36 BE : 45.43
Total Revenue (TTM) AII.TO : CA$32.51M BE : $2.02B
Gross Profit (TTM) AII.TO : CA$2.38M BE : $625.18M
EBITDA (TTM) AII.TO : -CA$156.37M BE : $20.05M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 73.24% return, which is significantly higher than BE's 54.37% return.

AII.TO

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -26.11%
• YTD: 73.24%
• 6M: 151.32%
• 1Y: 563.81%
• 3Y*: 180.74%
• 5Y*: 68.05%
• 10Y*: 46.32%

BE

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: -18.91%
• YTD: 54.37%
• 6M: 46.44%
• 1Y: 505.86%
• 3Y*: 89.76%
• 5Y*: 40.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AII.TO vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO

AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BE

BE Risk / Return Rank: 97
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AII.TO vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AII.TO	BE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	6.28	5.06	+1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	3.74	+0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.47	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.94	11.72	+0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.67	34.23	-7.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AII.TO vs. BE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 6.28, which is comparable to the BE Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and BE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AII.TO	BE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.28	5.06	+1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.50	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.27	-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and BE is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AII.TO vs. BE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AII.TO nor BE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, smaller than the maximum BE drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and BE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AII.TO	BE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.14%	-92.54%	+12.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.53%	-45.94%	+2.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.14%	-75.87%	+9.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.04%	-24.21%	-6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.31%	-53.10%	+19.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.48%	15.45%	+4.03%

Volatility

AII.TO vs. BE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) is 28.31%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 34.74%. This indicates that AII.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AII.TO	BE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.31%	34.74%	-6.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.24%	80.14%	-10.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.86%	100.98%	-10.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.70%	82.81%	-16.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.73%	93.10%	-20.37%

Financials