AII.TO vs. HYMC

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

AII.TO (Almonty Industries Inc.) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — AII.TO in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, HYMC in Gold. Over the past 5 years, AII.TO returned 71.64%/yr vs -1.54%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AII.TO vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AII.TO is traded in CAD, while HYMC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYMC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 94.37% return, which is significantly higher than HYMC's 2.14% return.

AII.TO

• 1D: 2.40%
• 1M: -14.19%
• YTD: 94.37%
• 6M: 93.56%
• 1Y: 132.74%
• 3Y*: 196.50%
• 5Y*: 71.64%
• 10Y*: 48.01%

HYMC

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -27.01%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 676.43%
• 3Y*: 104.06%
• 5Y*: -1.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AII.TO vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AII.TO Almonty Industries Inc.	94.37%	784.25%	68.52%	-20.59%	-23.60%	39.06%	52.38%	-35.38%	27.45%
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	2.14%	926.46%	-2.16%	-55.05%	-7.80%	-92.19%	-25.83%	0.30%	9.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and HYMC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018	0.13

Over the past year, AII.TO and HYMC have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap AII.TO : CA$6.53B HYMC : $2.10B
EPS AII.TO : -CA$0.50 HYMC : -$1.44
PB Ratio AII.TO : 18.33 HYMC : 9.38
Total Revenue (TTM) AII.TO : CA$50.01M HYMC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) AII.TO : CA$14.63M HYMC : -$4.65M
EBITDA (TTM) AII.TO : -CA$120.84M HYMC : -$69.17M

Return for Risk

AII.TO vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO

AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 79
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

HYMC

HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 97
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AII.TO vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AII.TO	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	5.77	-4.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	4.24	-2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.51	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	11.47	-9.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.06	27.76	-22.69

AII.TO vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 5.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and HYMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AII.TO	HYMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.14%	-98.84%	+18.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.79%	-59.53%	+4.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.79%	-61.75%	+6.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.43%	-93.25%	+33.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.85%	-84.16%	+57.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.47%	-63.84%	+30.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.31%	24.55%	+1.76%

Volatility

AII.TO vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a higher volatility of 31.36% compared to Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) at 26.44%. This indicates that AII.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AII.TO	HYMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.36%	26.44%	+4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.35%	86.23%	-18.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	98.99%	118.36%	-19.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.65%	152.95%	-78.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.28%	122.94%	-47.66%

Dividends

AII.TO vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither AII.TO nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AII.TO and HYMC in my portfolio?

AII.TO and HYMC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.