AIFD vs. ASMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH).

AIFD and ASMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIFD is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

AIFD vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AIFD vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	2.61%	62.49%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	25.77%	58.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIFD achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 25.77% return.

AIFD

• 1D: 5.59%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: 9.21%
• 1Y: 61.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -6.47%
• YTD: 25.77%
• 6M: 39.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIFD vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

AIFD

TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF

ASMH

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

AIFD vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIFD

AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 92
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIFD vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIFD	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.28	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIFD	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	3.00	-2.16

Correlation

The correlation between AIFD and ASMH is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AIFD vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.

	TTM	2025
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.29%	0.19%

Drawdowns

AIFD vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIFD drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIFD and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIFD	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.20%	-15.89%	-17.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.64%	-11.21%	+6.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-4.43%	-1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIFD	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.77%	36.81%	-6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.32%	36.81%	-7.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.32%	36.81%	-7.49%