AIBU vs. CRWG
AIBU (Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares) and CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AIBU is passively managed, while CRWG is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIBU charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRWG.
Performance
AIBU vs. CRWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIBU having a 45.72% return and CRWG slightly higher at 46.05%.
AIBU
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 24.46%
- YTD
- 45.72%
- 6M
- 34.76%
- 1Y
- 104.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWG
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- -34.22%
- YTD
- 46.05%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIBU vs. CRWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares | 45.72% | 8.98% |
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 46.05% | -83.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIBU and CRWG is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIBU vs. CRWG — Risk / Return Rank
AIBU
CRWG
AIBU vs. CRWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIBU | CRWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIBU | CRWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | -0.43 | +1.65 |
Drawdowns
AIBU vs. CRWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, smaller than the maximum CRWG drawdown of -89.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and CRWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIBU | CRWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.17% | -89.42% | +38.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.86% | -78.18% | +72.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.74% | -68.58% | +54.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.92% | — | — |
Volatility
AIBU vs. CRWG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIBU | CRWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.71% | 191.34% | -143.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.33% | 191.34% | -136.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.33% | 191.34% | -136.01% |
AIBU vs. CRWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than CRWG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIBU vs. CRWG - Dividend Comparison
AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than CRWG's 5.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares | 1.54% | 2.27% | 1.33% |
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 5.06% | 7.39% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIBU and CRWG have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 1.54% for AIBU.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for AIBU and 0.75% for CRWG.
Find the right allocation for AIBU and CRWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer