AIBU vs. QQUP
AIBU (Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares) and QQUP (ProShares Ultra Top QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - AIBU tracks the Solactive US AI & Big Data Index while QQUP tracks the Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIBU charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QQUP.
Performance
AIBU vs. QQUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIBU achieves a 54.78% return, which is significantly higher than QQUP's 19.26% return.
AIBU
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 36.15%
- YTD
- 54.78%
- 6M
- 41.27%
- 1Y
- 123.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQUP
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 11.36%
- YTD
- 19.26%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIBU vs. QQUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares | 54.78% | 33.98% |
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 19.26% | 44.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIBU and QQUP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIBU vs. QQUP — Risk / Return Rank
AIBU
QQUP
AIBU vs. QQUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIBU | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIBU | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.98 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
AIBU vs. QQUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIBU drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, which is greater than QQUP's maximum drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIBU and QQUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIBU | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.17% | -37.67% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.52% | +2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.78% | -9.21% | -4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.91% | — | — |
Volatility
AIBU vs. QQUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIBU | QQUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.51% | 38.35% | +9.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.33% | 38.35% | +16.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.33% | 38.35% | +16.98% |
AIBU vs. QQUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIBU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than QQUP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIBU vs. QQUP - Dividend Comparison
AIBU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than QQUP's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AIBU Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares | 1.45% | 2.27% | 1.33% |
QQUP ProShares Ultra Top QQQ | 0.40% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIBU and QQUP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQUP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQUP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.
AIBU has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.40% for QQUP.
AIBU tracks Solactive US AI & Big Data Index, while QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for AIBU and 0.95% for QQUP.
Find the right allocation for AIBU and QQUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer