AIAGY vs. CMC
AIAGY (Aurubis AG ADR) and CMC (Commercial Metals Company) are both stocks. AIAGY operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while CMC operates in Steel (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, AIAGY returned 27.61%/yr vs 20.29%/yr for CMC. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AIAGY vs. CMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIAGY achieves a 75.61% return, which is significantly higher than CMC's 10.81% return.
AIAGY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 17.65%
- YTD
- 75.61%
- 6M
- 113.35%
- 1Y
- 201.81%
- 3Y*
- 51.16%
- 5Y*
- 27.61%
- 10Y*
- —
CMC
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 57.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.11%
- 5Y*
- 20.29%
- 10Y*
- 17.95%
AIAGY vs. CMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIAGY Aurubis AG ADR | 75.61% | 73.64% | 3.58% | 7.58% | -15.19% | 20.75% | 41.55% | 25.32% |
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 10.81% | 41.52% | 0.41% | 4.99% | 35.05% | 79.83% | -5.45% | 28.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIAGY and CMC is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
AIAGY:
$11.22B
CMC:
$8.55B
AIAGY:
$10.61
CMC:
$4.50
AIAGY:
12.12
CMC:
16.96
AIAGY:
0.32
CMC:
1.62
AIAGY:
0.55
CMC:
1.02
AIAGY:
1.94
CMC:
1.94
AIAGY:
$20.27B
CMC:
$8.39B
AIAGY:
$1.83B
CMC:
$1.49B
AIAGY:
$1.60B
CMC:
$905.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIAGY vs. CMC — Risk / Return Rank
AIAGY
CMC
AIAGY vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurubis AG ADR (AIAGY) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIAGY | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.97 | 1.28 | +1.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.84 | 1.92 | +9.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.74 | 5.45 | +32.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIAGY | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 1.70 | +2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.57 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.37 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
AIAGY vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIAGY drawdown since its inception was -59.06%, smaller than the maximum CMC drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAGY and CMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIAGY | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.06% | -83.77% | +24.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.15% | -29.96% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.53% | -37.63% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.06% | -37.63% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.04% | +8.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.71% | -23.53% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.37% | 10.51% | -5.14% |
Volatility
AIAGY vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison
Aurubis AG ADR (AIAGY) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Commercial Metals Company (CMC) at 8.65%. This indicates that AIAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIAGY | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 8.65% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.80% | 24.43% | +7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.99% | 33.69% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.78% | 35.51% | +12.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.75% | 39.70% | +7.05% |
Dividends
AIAGY vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison
AIAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than CMC's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIAGY Aurubis AG ADR | 0.74% | 1.05% | 1.75% | 2.28% | 2.23% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.41% | 1.28% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 2.34% | 2.16% | 3.00% | 2.25% | 2.20% | 3.51% |
Financials
AIAGY vs. CMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurubis AG ADR and Commercial Metals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AIAGY vs. CMC - Profitability Comparison
AIAGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported a gross profit of 693.22M and revenue of 6.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.3%.
CMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 387.91M and revenue of 2.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.
AIAGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported an operating income of 643.41M and revenue of 6.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
CMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 154.74M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
AIAGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported a net income of 486.57M and revenue of 6.14B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
CMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 93.03M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIAGY and CMC have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIAGY has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to CMC (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIAGY dropped -59.06% vs CMC's -83.77%.
AIAGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIAGY and CMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer