AIAGY vs. CMC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aurubis AG ADR (AIAGY) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC).

Performance

AIAGY vs. CMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aurubis AG ADR (AIAGY) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AIAGY vs. CMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIAGY Aurubis AG ADR	17.64%	73.64%	3.58%	7.58%	-15.19%	20.75%	41.55%	25.32%
CMC Commercial Metals Company	-11.04%	41.52%	0.41%	4.99%	35.05%	79.83%	-5.45%	28.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AIAGY : $7.52B CMC : $6.89B
EPS AIAGY : $6.90 CMC : $4.48
PE Ratio AIAGY : 12.48 CMC : 13.70
PEG Ratio AIAGY : 0.29 CMC : 1.31
PS Ratio AIAGY : 0.39 CMC : 0.83
PB Ratio AIAGY : 1.41 CMC : 1.56
Total Revenue (TTM) AIAGY : $19.14B CMC : $8.39B
Gross Profit (TTM) AIAGY : $1.66B CMC : $1.49B
EBITDA (TTM) AIAGY : $1.17B CMC : $905.85M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAGY achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than CMC's -11.04% return.

AIAGY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -15.88%
• YTD: 17.64%
• 6M: 38.99%
• 1Y: 79.28%
• 3Y*: 25.29%
• 5Y*: 18.25%
• 10Y*: —

CMC

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: -16.19%
• YTD: -11.04%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 34.71%
• 3Y*: 9.21%
• 5Y*: 16.31%
• 10Y*: 15.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AIAGY vs. CMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAGY

AIAGY Risk / Return Rank: 93
AIAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AIAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AIAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
AIAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AIAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CMC

CMC Risk / Return Rank: 70
CMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CMC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CMC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAGY vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurubis AG ADR (AIAGY) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AIAGY	CMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	0.93	+0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	1.47	+2.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.93	1.19	+0.74
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	1.16	+3.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.43	4.26	+7.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AIAGY vs. CMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAGY Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the CMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAGY and CMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AIAGY	CMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	0.93	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.46	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.35	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between AIAGY and CMC is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AIAGY vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison

AIAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than CMC's 0.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIAGY Aurubis AG ADR	2.00%	1.05%	1.75%	2.28%	2.23%	1.08%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CMC Commercial Metals Company	0.88%	1.04%	1.41%	1.28%	1.20%	1.38%	2.34%	2.16%	3.00%	2.25%	2.20%	3.51%

Drawdowns

AIAGY vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAGY drawdown since its inception was -59.06%, smaller than the maximum CMC drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAGY and CMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIAGY	CMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.06%	-83.77%	+24.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.15%	-29.96%	+12.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.06%	-37.63%	-21.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.80%	-26.17%	+9.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.29%	-23.56%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.94%	8.16%	-1.22%

Volatility

AIAGY vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aurubis AG ADR (AIAGY) is 10.84%, while Commercial Metals Company (CMC) has a volatility of 12.87%. This indicates that AIAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AIAGY	CMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.84%	12.87%	-2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.61%	25.83%	+3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.82%	37.61%	+4.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.15%	35.54%	+11.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.91%	39.65%	+7.26%

Financials

AIAGY vs. CMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aurubis AG ADR and Commercial Metals Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AIAGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported a gross profit of 459.65M and revenue of 5.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.8%.

CMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 387.91M and revenue of 2.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

AIAGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported an operating income of 420.02M and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

CMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 154.74M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

AIAGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported a net income of 318.98M and revenue of 5.23B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

CMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 93.03M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.