AIAGY vs. FCX
AIAGY (Aurubis AG ADR) and FCX (Freeport-McMoRan Inc.) are both stocks. AIAGY operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while FCX operates in Copper (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, AIAGY returned 27.61%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for FCX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AIAGY vs. FCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIAGY achieves a 75.61% return, which is significantly higher than FCX's 37.86% return.
AIAGY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 17.65%
- YTD
- 75.61%
- 6M
- 113.35%
- 1Y
- 201.81%
- 3Y*
- 51.16%
- 5Y*
- 27.61%
- 10Y*
- —
FCX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 20.82%
- YTD
- 37.86%
- 6M
- 56.95%
- 1Y
- 72.54%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 20.74%
AIAGY vs. FCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIAGY Aurubis AG ADR | 75.61% | 73.64% | 3.58% | 7.58% | -15.19% | 20.75% | 41.55% | 25.32% |
FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 37.86% | 35.41% | -9.41% | 13.69% | -7.91% | 61.41% | 99.06% | 30.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIAGY and FCX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
AIAGY:
$11.22B
FCX:
$100.63B
AIAGY:
$10.61
FCX:
$1.89
AIAGY:
12.12
FCX:
36.81
AIAGY:
0.55
FCX:
3.81
AIAGY:
1.94
FCX:
5.16
AIAGY:
$20.27B
FCX:
$26.42B
AIAGY:
$1.83B
FCX:
$7.35B
AIAGY:
$1.60B
FCX:
$9.59B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIAGY vs. FCX — Risk / Return Rank
AIAGY
FCX
AIAGY vs. FCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurubis AG ADR (AIAGY) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AIAGY | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.97 | 1.27 | +1.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.84 | 2.93 | +8.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.74 | 7.39 | +30.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AIAGY | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 1.54 | +3.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.27 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.16 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
AIAGY vs. FCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIAGY drawdown since its inception was -59.06%, smaller than the maximum FCX drawdown of -92.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAGY and FCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIAGY | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.06% | -92.52% | +33.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.15% | -24.90% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.53% | -46.34% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.06% | -51.47% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.83% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.71% | -39.64% | +18.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.37% | 9.85% | -4.48% |
Volatility
AIAGY vs. FCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aurubis AG ADR (AIAGY) is 9.26%, while Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) has a volatility of 14.31%. This indicates that AIAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIAGY | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 14.31% | -5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.80% | 35.67% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.99% | 47.48% | -3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.78% | 44.84% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.75% | 48.61% | -1.86% |
Dividends
AIAGY vs. FCX - Dividend Comparison
AIAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than FCX's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIAGY Aurubis AG ADR | 0.74% | 1.05% | 1.75% | 2.28% | 2.23% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 0.86% | 1.18% | 1.58% | 1.41% | 0.99% | 0.54% | 0.19% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.46% |
Financials
AIAGY vs. FCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurubis AG ADR and Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AIAGY vs. FCX - Profitability Comparison
AIAGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported a gross profit of 693.22M and revenue of 6.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.3%.
FCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
AIAGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported an operating income of 643.41M and revenue of 6.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
FCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported an operating income of 2.14B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
AIAGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aurubis AG ADR reported a net income of 486.57M and revenue of 6.14B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
FCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. reported a net income of 881.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AIAGY and FCX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCX has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to AIAGY (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIAGY dropped -59.06% vs FCX's -92.52%.
AIAGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AIAGY and FCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer