AIA vs. HUMN
AIA (iShares Asia 50 ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia 50, while HUMN is a Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill. AIA is passively managed, while HUMN is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AIA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUMN.
Performance
AIA vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 44.56% return, which is significantly higher than HUMN's 18.42% return.
AIA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 44.56%
- 6M
- 50.54%
- 1Y
- 83.79%
- 3Y*
- 34.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
HUMN
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIA vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 44.56% | 21.98% |
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 18.42% | 20.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and HUMN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.78 |
AIA vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AIA
HUMN
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AIA
HUMN
Financial Services
AIA
HUMN
Consumer Cyclical
AIA
HUMN
Communication Services
AIA
HUMN
Industrials
AIA
HUMN
Healthcare
AIA
HUMN
-
Energy
AIA
HUMN
-
Real Estate
AIA
HUMN
-
Basic Materials
AIA
-
HUMN
Consumer Defensive
AIA
-
HUMN
-
Utilities
AIA
-
HUMN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIA vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank
AIA
HUMN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIA vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIA | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIA vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and HUMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIA | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.89% | -20.40% | -40.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.44% | -9.15% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.66% | -4.55% | -12.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | — | — |
Volatility
AIA vs. HUMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIA | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.93% | 30.67% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 30.67% | -4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 30.67% | -6.89% |
AIA vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HUMN's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AIA vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than HUMN's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 1.73% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.61% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIA and HUMN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HUMN.
AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.61% for HUMN.
AIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HUMN is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AIA and 0.75% for HUMN.
Find the right allocation for AIA and HUMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer