PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHT vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHT achieves a -23.94% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AHT has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of -50.80%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.49% annualized return.


AHT

1D
0.62%
1M
8.72%
YTD
-23.94%
6M
-13.60%
1Y
-45.18%
3Y*
-54.89%
5Y*
-63.53%
10Y*
-50.80%

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHT
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
-23.94%-40.75%-62.94%-56.60%-53.44%-62.93%-90.72%-22.08%-35.34%-6.44%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AHT and VGT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.37

The correlation between AHT and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHT
AHT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHTVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.35

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

2.87

-3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

8.76

-9.78

AHT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHT drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHTVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-54.63%

-45.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.81%

-16.40%

-48.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.62%

-27.23%

-66.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.50%

-35.07%

-64.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.96%

-35.07%

-64.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-7.71%

-92.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.07%

-7.95%

-38.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.53%

5.36%

+39.17%

Volatility

AHT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) is 10.36%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that AHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHTVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.36%

11.39%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.55%

18.58%

+16.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.50%

22.72%

+44.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.77%

25.55%

+53.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.70%

24.77%

+96.93%

Dividends

AHT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

AHT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHT
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.94%12.00%7.13%6.19%17.40%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHT and VGT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to AHT (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHT dropped -99.96% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHT and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer