PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHT vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHT achieves a -23.71% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.47% return. Over the past 10 years, AHT has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of -51.76%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.01% annualized return.


AHT

1D
0.62%
1M
2.52%
6M
-14.92%
YTD
-23.71%
1Y
-48.25%
3Y*
-54.19%
5Y*
-52.76%
10Y*
-51.76%
ALL TIME*
-24.31%

VGT

1D
1.76%
1M
0.44%
6M
22.59%
YTD
22.47%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
24.01%
ALL TIME*
14.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.36K$56.64K$105.00K
$454.00M$507.98M$575.23M

AHT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHT
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
-23.71%-40.75%-62.94%-56.60%-53.44%-62.93%-90.72%-22.08%-35.34%-6.44%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.47%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AHT and VGT is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.37

The correlation between AHT and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AHT
AHT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AHT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHTVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.26

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

2.28

-3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

6.12

-7.27

AHT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHT drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHTVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-54.63%

-45.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.78%

-16.40%

-43.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.34%

-27.23%

-65.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.41%

-35.07%

-63.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.96%

-35.07%

-64.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-8.34%

-91.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.33%

-7.95%

-38.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.97%

6.09%

+35.88%

Volatility

AHT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) is 3.23%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that AHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHTVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

8.34%

-5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.55%

20.11%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.21%

24.25%

+41.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.38%

25.85%

+49.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.61%

24.90%

+96.71%

Dividends

AHT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

AHT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHT
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.94%12.00%7.13%6.19%17.40%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHT and VGT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to AHT (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHT dropped -99.96% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHT and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer