AHT vs. GLDM
AHT (Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.) is a stock, while GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 5 years, AHT returned -52.76%/yr vs 17.32%/yr for GLDM. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AHT vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHT achieves a -23.71% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's -6.13% return.
AHT
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- -14.92%
- YTD
- -23.71%
- 1Y
- -48.25%
- 3Y*
- -54.19%
- 5Y*
- -52.76%
- 10Y*
- -51.76%
- ALL TIME*
- -24.31%
GLDM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -12.88%
- YTD
- -6.13%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 27.67%
- 5Y*
- 17.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.36K | $56.64K | $105.00K | |
| $270.09M | $250.20M | $318.17M |
AHT vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHT Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. | -23.71% | -40.75% | -62.94% | -56.60% | -53.44% | -62.93% | -90.72% | -22.08% | -41.12% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | -6.13% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHT and GLDM is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHT vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
AHT
GLDM
AHT vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AHT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.16 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 0.79 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 1.69 | -2.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AHT vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHT drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT and GLDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -26.27% | -73.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.78% | -26.27% | -33.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.34% | -26.27% | -66.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.41% | -26.27% | -72.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -24.94% | -75.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.33% | -6.57% | -39.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.97% | 12.22% | +29.75% |
Volatility
AHT vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) is 3.23%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that AHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 6.00% | -2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.55% | 20.89% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.21% | 27.91% | +38.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.38% | 18.40% | +56.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.61% | 17.09% | +104.52% |
Dividends
AHT vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither AHT nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHT Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.94% | 12.00% | 7.13% | 6.19% | 17.40% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHT and GLDM have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDM has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to AHT (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHT dropped -99.96% vs GLDM's -26.27%.
GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AHT and GLDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer