AHT vs. GLDM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).

GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018.

Performance

AHT vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AHT vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AHT Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.	-35.68%	-40.75%	-62.94%	-56.60%	-53.44%	-62.93%	-90.72%	-22.08%	-40.80%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	8.57%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHT achieves a -35.68% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.

AHT

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: -8.36%
• YTD: -35.68%
• 6M: -53.56%
• 1Y: -61.79%
• 3Y*: -55.97%
• 5Y*: -60.67%
• 10Y*: -52.27%

GLDM

• 1D: 3.77%
• 1M: -10.99%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 21.24%
• 1Y: 49.77%
• 3Y*: 33.33%
• 5Y*: 21.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AHT vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHT

AHT Risk / Return Rank: 4
AHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
AHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
AHT Omega Ratio Rank: 5
AHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
AHT Martin Ratio Rank: 4

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 88
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHT vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AHT	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	1.82	-2.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.91	2.25	-4.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.33	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	2.71	-3.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.77	10.04	-11.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AHT vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHT and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AHT	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	1.82	-2.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.72	1.25	-1.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	1.09	-1.37

Correlation

The correlation between AHT and GLDM is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AHT vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither AHT nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHT Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.94%	12.00%	7.13%	6.19%	17.40%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AHT vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHT drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHT	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.96%	-21.63%	-78.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.77%	-19.14%	-43.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.59%	-20.92%	-78.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.96%	-13.19%	-86.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.54%	-6.04%	-39.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.22%	5.16%	+30.06%

Volatility

AHT vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 11.01%. This indicates that AHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHT	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	11.01%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.68%	24.07%	+33.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.83%	27.57%	+41.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.94%	17.65%	+67.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.73%	16.77%	+104.96%