PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHT vs. ESRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AHT vs. ESRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHT achieves a -24.88% return, which is significantly lower than ESRT's -15.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AHT has underperformed ESRT with an annualized return of -51.33%, while ESRT has yielded a comparatively higher -10.19% annualized return.


AHT

1D
-0.31%
1M
8.11%
6M
-25.75%
YTD
-24.88%
1Y
-54.87%
3Y*
-57.12%
5Y*
-57.54%
10Y*
-51.33%

ESRT

1D
0.74%
1M
0.46%
6M
-13.90%
YTD
-15.62%
1Y
-32.27%
3Y*
-11.05%
5Y*
-13.50%
10Y*
-10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHT vs. ESRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHT
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
-24.88%-40.75%-62.94%-56.60%-53.44%-62.93%-90.72%-22.08%-35.34%-6.44%
ESRT
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
-15.62%-35.68%7.97%46.32%-22.82%-3.53%-31.48%0.90%-28.91%3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AHT and ESRT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013

0.39

The correlation between AHT and ESRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AHT:

$20.72M

ESRT:

$931.03M

EPS

AHT:

-$36.02

ESRT:

$0.14

PS Ratio

AHT:

0.02

ESRT:

1.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

AHT:

$1.09B

ESRT:

$778.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AHT:

-$67.55M

ESRT:

$77.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

AHT:

$55.94M

ESRT:

$306.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHT vs. ESRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHT
AHT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
AHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
AHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ESRT
ESRT Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ESRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ESRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESRT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHT vs. ESRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHTESRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.84

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.84

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

-1.40

+0.15

AHT vs. ESRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHT Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the ESRT Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHT and ESRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHT vs. ESRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHT drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than ESRT's maximum drawdown of -72.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT and ESRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHTESRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-72.91%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.47%

-38.90%

-24.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.52%

-55.39%

-38.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.80%

-55.39%

-43.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.96%

-72.91%

-27.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-70.04%

-29.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-33.84%

-12.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.01%

23.31%

+21.70%

Volatility

AHT vs. ESRT - Volatility Comparison

Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (AHT) and Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT) have volatilities of 10.32% and 9.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHTESRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.32%

9.98%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.82%

23.90%

+6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.46%

32.57%

+33.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.63%

34.81%

+41.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.60%

36.03%

+85.57%

Dividends

AHT vs. ESRT - Dividend Comparison

AHT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHT
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.94%12.00%7.13%6.19%17.40%
ESRT
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.
2.58%2.15%1.36%1.44%2.08%1.18%2.25%3.01%2.95%2.05%1.98%1.88%

Financials

AHT vs. ESRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
267.73M
190.33M
(AHT) Total Revenue
(ESRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AHT vs. ESRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
81.8%
Portfolio components
AHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 267.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ESRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 155.71M and revenue of 190.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

AHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.25M and revenue of 267.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

ESRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.46M and revenue of 190.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.

AHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -63.95M and revenue of 267.73M, resulting in a net margin of -23.9%.

ESRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 1.24M and revenue of 190.33M, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AHT and ESRT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHT has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to ESRT (9.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHT dropped -99.96% vs ESRT's -72.91%.

AHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHT and ESRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer