PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHCO vs. HCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AHCO vs. HCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHCO achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than HCC's -10.34% return.


AHCO

1D
0.55%
1M
15.01%
6M
3.30%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
-8.80%
5Y*
-15.52%
10Y*

HCC

1D
-1.90%
1M
-17.00%
6M
-21.00%
YTD
-10.34%
1Y
50.42%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
38.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHCO vs. HCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AHCO
AdaptHealth Corp.
10.04%4.62%30.59%-62.07%-21.42%-34.88%242.08%11.70%1.34%
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
-10.34%63.49%-9.79%81.59%41.03%21.82%2.30%1.98%-8.68%

Correlation

The correlation between AHCO and HCC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2018

0.07

The correlation between AHCO and HCC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AHCO:

$1.49B

HCC:

$4.17B

EPS

AHCO:

-$0.60

HCC:

$2.61

PS Ratio

AHCO:

0.48

HCC:

2.83

PB Ratio

AHCO:

0.98

HCC:

1.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

AHCO:

$3.08B

HCC:

$1.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AHCO:

$260.17M

HCC:

$887.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

AHCO:

$380.93M

HCC:

$296.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHCO vs. HCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHCO
AHCO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AHCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AHCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHCO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

HCC
HCC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHCO vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AHCOHCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.72

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.54

4.14

-2.60

AHCO vs. HCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the HCC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHCO and HCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AHCO vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHCO drawdown since its inception was -83.84%, which is greater than HCC's maximum drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHCO and HCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHCOHCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.84%

-64.81%

-19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.77%

-29.51%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.06%

-45.53%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.18%

-45.53%

-30.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.70%

-28.45%

-44.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.67%

-18.15%

-25.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.42%

12.20%

+0.22%

Volatility

AHCO vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison

AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) have volatilities of 11.19% and 11.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHCOHCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.19%

11.05%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.11%

37.35%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.69%

55.00%

-8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.24%

49.40%

+8.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.55%

52.41%

+2.14%

Dividends

AHCO vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison

AHCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AHCO
AdaptHealth Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HCC
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
0.41%0.36%1.51%1.90%4.45%0.78%0.94%21.85%27.91%45.17%

Financials

AHCO vs. HCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AdaptHealth Corp. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
819.80M
458.59M
(AHCO) Total Revenue
(HCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AHCO vs. HCC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AdaptHealth Corp. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April0
98.2%
Portfolio components
AHCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 819.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 450.26M and revenue of 458.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.

AHCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported an operating income of 5.49M and revenue of 819.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.

HCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of 79.37M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

AHCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported a net income of -16.04M and revenue of 819.80M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.

HCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of 72.34M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AHCO and HCC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHCO has higher volatility (11.19%) compared to HCC (11.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHCO dropped -83.84% vs HCC's -64.81%.

HCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHCO and HCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer