AHCO vs. HCC
AHCO (AdaptHealth Corp.) and HCC (Warrior Met Coal, Inc.) are both stocks. AHCO operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while HCC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, AHCO returned -17.74%/yr vs 43.43%/yr for HCC. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AHCO vs. HCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHCO achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly lower than HCC's 20.31% return.
AHCO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -25.46%
- YTD
- -2.41%
- 6M
- 4.07%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- -2.54%
- 5Y*
- -17.74%
- 10Y*
- —
HCC
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- 26.02%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 6M
- 27.92%
- 1Y
- 130.83%
- 3Y*
- 45.77%
- 5Y*
- 43.43%
- 10Y*
- —
AHCO vs. HCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHCO AdaptHealth Corp. | -2.41% | 4.62% | 30.59% | -62.07% | -21.42% | -34.88% | 242.08% | 11.70% | 1.34% |
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | 20.31% | 63.49% | -9.79% | 81.59% | 41.03% | 21.82% | 2.30% | 1.98% | -7.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHCO and HCC is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2018 | 0.07 |
The correlation between AHCO and HCC shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AHCO:
$1.32B
HCC:
$5.59B
AHCO:
-$0.60
HCC:
$2.61
AHCO:
0.43
HCC:
3.80
AHCO:
0.87
HCC:
2.53
AHCO:
$3.08B
HCC:
$1.47B
AHCO:
$260.17M
HCC:
$887.07M
AHCO:
$380.93M
HCC:
$296.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHCO vs. HCC — Risk / Return Rank
AHCO
HCC
AHCO vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHCO | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 2.33 | -2.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 3.17 | -2.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.39 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 5.39 | -5.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 13.57 | -12.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHCO | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 2.33 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.88 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.68 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
AHCO vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHCO drawdown since its inception was -83.84%, which is greater than HCC's maximum drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHCO and HCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHCO | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.84% | -64.81% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.88% | -24.41% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.06% | -45.53% | -10.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.29% | -45.53% | -32.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.79% | -3.99% | -71.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.23% | -18.12% | -25.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | 9.68% | -0.47% |
Volatility
AHCO vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) is 12.42%, while Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) has a volatility of 22.07%. This indicates that AHCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHCO | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.42% | 22.07% | -9.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.27% | 36.11% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.49% | 56.62% | -10.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.22% | 49.60% | +8.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.80% | 52.53% | +2.27% |
Dividends
AHCO vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison
AHCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHCO AdaptHealth Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | 0.30% | 0.36% | 1.51% | 1.90% | 4.45% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 21.85% | 27.91% | 45.17% |
Financials
AHCO vs. HCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AdaptHealth Corp. and Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AHCO vs. HCC - Profitability Comparison
AHCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 819.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 450.26M and revenue of 458.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.
AHCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported an operating income of 5.49M and revenue of 819.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
HCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of 79.37M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
AHCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported a net income of -16.04M and revenue of 819.80M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.
HCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of 72.34M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AHCO and HCC have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCC has higher volatility (22.07%) compared to AHCO (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHCO dropped -83.84% vs HCC's -64.81%.
HCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AHCO and HCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer