AHCO vs. VIK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AHCO (AdaptHealth Corp.) and VIK (Viking Holdings Ltd) are both stocks. AHCO operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while VIK operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, AHCO returned 9.71% vs 90.95% for VIK. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AHCO vs. VIK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHCO achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly lower than VIK's 24.13% return.

AHCO

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -25.46%
• YTD: -2.41%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: 9.71%
• 3Y*: -2.54%
• 5Y*: -17.74%
• 10Y*: —

VIK

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 12.16%
• YTD: 24.13%
• 6M: 31.24%
• 1Y: 90.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHCO vs. VIK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AHCO AdaptHealth Corp.	-2.41%	4.62%	-5.37%
VIK Viking Holdings Ltd	24.13%	62.07%	68.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AHCO and VIK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap AHCO : $1.32B VIK : $39.52B
EPS AHCO : -$0.60 VIK : $2.69
PS Ratio AHCO : 0.43 VIK : 5.93
PB Ratio AHCO : 0.87 VIK : 37.05
Total Revenue (TTM) AHCO : $3.08B VIK : $6.66B
Gross Profit (TTM) AHCO : $260.17M VIK : $2.58B
EBITDA (TTM) AHCO : $380.93M VIK : $1.74B

Return for Risk

AHCO vs. VIK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHCO

AHCO Risk / Return Rank: 48
AHCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AHCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
AHCO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AHCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
AHCO Martin Ratio Rank: 53

VIK

VIK Risk / Return Rank: 91
VIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VIK Omega Ratio Rank: 86
VIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VIK Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHCO vs. VIK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AHCO	VIK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	2.42	-2.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	3.19	-2.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.38	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	6.12	-5.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.06	16.95	-15.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AHCO vs. VIK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the VIK Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHCO and VIK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AHCO	VIK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	2.42	-2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	1.96	-1.96

Drawdowns

AHCO vs. VIK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHCO drawdown since its inception was -83.84%, which is greater than VIK's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHCO and VIK.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHCO	VIK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.84%	-35.39%	-48.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.88%	-14.94%	-12.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.79%	-4.22%	-71.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.23%	-6.11%	-37.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.21%	5.38%	+3.83%

Volatility

AHCO vs. VIK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdaptHealth Corp. (AHCO) is 12.42%, while Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) has a volatility of 13.50%. This indicates that AHCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHCO	VIK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.42%	13.50%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.27%	31.98%	+1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.49%	37.89%	+8.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.22%	40.95%	+17.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.80%	40.95%	+13.85%

Dividends

AHCO vs. VIK - Dividend Comparison

Neither AHCO nor VIK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AHCO vs. VIK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AdaptHealth Corp. and Viking Holdings Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AHCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 819.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VIK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 284.28M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.

AHCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported an operating income of 5.49M and revenue of 819.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.

VIK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 12.06M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

AHCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AdaptHealth Corp. reported a net income of -16.04M and revenue of 819.80M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.

VIK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a net income of -54.38M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AHCO and VIK in my portfolio?

AHCO and VIK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AHCO or VIK?

VIK has higher volatility (13.50%) compared to AHCO (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHCO dropped -83.84% vs VIK's -35.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.