AGRH vs. FLTR
AGRH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGRH is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AGRH returned 5.84%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGRH charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
AGRH vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGRH achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.19% return.
AGRH
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 6.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 5.21%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
AGRH vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRH iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.97% | 6.00% | 5.93% | 6.40% | 1.76% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.19% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGRH and FLTR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGRH vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
AGRH
FLTR
AGRH vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGRH) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGRH | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.07 | 3.02 | -0.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.06 | 16.69 | -7.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.14 | 97.91 | -54.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGRH vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGRH drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRH and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGRH | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -17.84% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.67% | -0.31% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.73% | -1.93% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.15% | -0.67% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.14% | 0.05% | +0.09% |
Volatility
AGRH vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGRH) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) have volatilities of 0.28% and 0.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGRH | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.28% | 0.29% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.00% | 0.66% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44% | 0.81% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 2.13% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 5.00% | -3.23% |
AGRH vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGRH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AGRH vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
AGRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRH iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.17% | 4.63% | 5.17% | 4.69% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGRH and FLTR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLTR has higher volatility (0.29%) compared to AGRH (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRH dropped -1.73% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 3-year performance, FLTR leads with 6.16% vs 5.84% for AGRH. On fees, AGRH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 6.16% return vs 5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGRH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.17% for AGRH.
AGRH is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. AGRH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for AGRH and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.50 vs 4.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGRH and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer