PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGQ vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGQ vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -58.02% return, which is significantly lower than UVXY's -24.94% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has outperformed UVXY with an annualized return of 4.34%, while UVXY has yielded a comparatively lower -73.90% annualized return.


AGQ

1D
2.17%
1M
-45.30%
YTD
-58.02%
6M
-61.16%
1Y
35.08%
3Y*
34.09%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
4.34%

UVXY

1D
-2.46%
1M
-14.14%
YTD
-24.94%
6M
-26.89%
1Y
-71.73%
3Y*
-62.37%
5Y*
-66.99%
10Y*
-73.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGQ vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
-58.02%360.71%23.92%-15.09%-7.89%-32.25%62.02%20.02%-22.10%5.49%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-24.94%-65.32%-50.90%-87.70%-44.81%-88.33%-17.38%-84.23%60.10%-94.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AGQ and UVXY is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGQ vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGQ
AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGQ vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGQUVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.83

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

-0.99

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

-1.43

+2.22

AGQ vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGQ and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGQ vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, roughly equal to the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGQUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.16%

-100.00%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.08%

-72.74%

-11.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.08%

-94.91%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.08%

-99.71%

+15.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.08%

-100.00%

+15.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.09%

-100.00%

+8.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.87%

-98.75%

+18.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.27%

50.54%

-6.27%

Volatility

AGQ vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 31.74% compared to ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) at 25.55%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGQUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.74%

25.55%

+6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

135.91%

66.08%

+69.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

124.44%

84.93%

+39.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.81%

103.95%

-28.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.28%

112.35%

-46.07%

AGQ vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGQ vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

Neither AGQ nor UVXY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AGQ and UVXY have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGQ has higher volatility (31.74%) compared to UVXY (25.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQ dropped -98.16% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, AGQ leads with 4.34% vs -73.90% for UVXY. On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, UVXY has been the lower-risk option at 25.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 4.34% return vs -73.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.

AGQ and UVXY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AGQ is categorized as Silver, while UVXY is Volatility. AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.93% for AGQ and 0.95% for UVXY.

AGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGQ and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer