PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGQ vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGQ vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -29.18% return, which is significantly lower than UVXY's -23.07% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has outperformed UVXY with an annualized return of 11.51%, while UVXY has yielded a comparatively lower -72.73% annualized return.


AGQ

1D
2.38%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-29.18%
6M
1.31%
1Y
149.89%
3Y*
55.60%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
11.51%

UVXY

1D
-4.95%
1M
-26.21%
YTD
-23.07%
6M
-39.47%
1Y
-74.10%
3Y*
-64.78%
5Y*
-68.23%
10Y*
-72.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGQ vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
-29.18%360.71%23.92%-15.09%-7.89%-32.25%62.02%20.02%-22.10%5.49%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-23.07%-65.32%-50.90%-87.70%-44.81%-88.33%-17.38%-84.23%60.10%-94.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AGQ and UVXY is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGQ vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGQ
AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGQ vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGQUVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.81

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

-0.97

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.75

-1.33

+5.07

AGQ vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGQ and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGQUVXYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

-0.88

+2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

-0.66

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

-0.64

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

-0.68

+0.76

Drawdowns

AGQ vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, roughly equal to the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGQUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.16%

-100.00%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.21%

-76.19%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.21%

-95.25%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.21%

-99.69%

+23.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.25%

-100.00%

+23.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.96%

-100.00%

+15.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.86%

-98.55%

+18.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.19%

55.83%

-15.64%

Volatility

AGQ vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 33.59% compared to ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) at 12.26%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGQUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.59%

12.26%

+21.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

133.69%

62.79%

+70.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

120.79%

84.51%

+36.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.68%

103.82%

-29.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.65%

113.81%

-48.16%

AGQ vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGQ vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

Neither AGQ nor UVXY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AGQ and UVXY have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGQ has higher volatility (33.59%) compared to UVXY (12.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQ dropped -98.16% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, AGQ leads with 11.51% vs -72.73% for UVXY. On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, UVXY has been the lower-risk option at 12.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 11.51% return vs -72.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.

AGQ and UVXY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AGQ is categorized as Silver, while UVXY is Volatility. AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.93% for AGQ and 0.95% for UVXY.

AGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGQ and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer