PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGQ vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGQ vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -52.18% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 5.67%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.


AGQ

1D
-10.97%
1M
-35.39%
YTD
-52.18%
6M
-55.31%
1Y
54.32%
3Y*
41.58%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
5.67%

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGQ vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
-52.18%360.71%23.92%-15.09%-7.89%-32.25%62.02%20.02%-22.10%5.49%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AGQ and UGA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2008

0.19

The correlation between AGQ and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGQ vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGQ
AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGQ vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGQUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

3.17

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

9.39

-8.14

AGQ vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGQ and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGQ vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, which is greater than UGA's maximum drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGQUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.16%

-86.59%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.48%

-18.96%

-62.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.48%

-26.68%

-54.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.48%

-38.11%

-43.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.48%

-75.89%

-5.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.85%

-18.05%

-71.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.87%

-36.69%

-43.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.63%

6.43%

+37.20%

Volatility

AGQ vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 29.28% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGQUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.28%

9.24%

+20.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

135.34%

30.57%

+104.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

123.59%

35.22%

+88.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.53%

34.45%

+41.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.15%

37.22%

+28.93%

AGQ vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGQ vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither AGQ nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AGQ and UGA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGQ has higher volatility (29.28%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQ dropped -98.16% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.31% vs 5.67% for AGQ. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.

AGQ and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AGQ is categorized as Silver, while UGA is Oil & Gas. AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.93% for AGQ and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGQ and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer