PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGQ vs. SLVP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGQ vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -30.83% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has underperformed SLVP with an annualized return of 11.35%, while SLVP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.67% annualized return.


AGQ

1D
-5.25%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-30.83%
6M
-5.75%
1Y
142.76%
3Y*
54.17%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
11.35%

SLVP

1D
-5.14%
1M
1.42%
YTD
2.25%
6M
13.09%
1Y
112.07%
3Y*
52.07%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGQ vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
-30.83%360.71%23.92%-15.09%-7.89%-32.25%62.02%20.02%-22.10%5.49%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
2.25%202.84%14.47%-2.31%-18.06%-23.53%56.45%37.71%-22.10%4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AGQ and SLVP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.73

The correlation between AGQ and SLVP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGQ vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGQ
AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVP
SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGQ vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGQSLVPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

2.12

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.40

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.36

-1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.59

8.53

-4.94

AGQ vs. SLVP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the SLVP Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGQ and SLVP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGQSLVPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.12

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.38

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.32

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.09

-0.01

Drawdowns

AGQ vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, which is greater than SLVP's maximum drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and SLVP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGQSLVPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.16%

-80.47%

-17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.21%

-33.57%

-42.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.21%

-33.57%

-42.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.21%

-54.78%

-21.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.25%

-62.03%

-14.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.31%

-26.25%

-59.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.86%

-46.82%

-33.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.92%

13.18%

+26.74%

Volatility

AGQ vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 33.51% compared to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) at 17.59%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGQSLVPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.51%

17.59%

+15.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

133.70%

43.22%

+90.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

120.79%

53.06%

+67.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.68%

42.76%

+31.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.66%

42.24%

+23.42%

AGQ vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGQ vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison

AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGQ
ProShares Ultra Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
1.74%1.78%1.05%0.88%0.63%1.63%2.39%2.03%1.28%0.85%2.32%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGQ and SLVP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGQ has higher volatility (33.51%) compared to SLVP (17.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQ dropped -98.16% vs SLVP's -80.47%.

On 10-year performance, SLVP leads with 13.67% vs 11.35% for AGQ. On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SLVP has been the lower-risk option at 17.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 13.67% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.

SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.

AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.93% for AGQ and 0.39% for SLVP.

SLVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGQ and SLVP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer