AGQ vs. BITU
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU).
AGQ and BITU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. BITU is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Apr 1, 2024. Both AGQ and BITU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AGQ vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGQ vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -23.34% | 360.71% | 6.99% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -46.65% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -23.34% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -46.65% return.
AGQ
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -32.70%
- YTD
- -23.34%
- 6M
- 51.96%
- 1Y
- 163.54%
- 3Y*
- 56.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.25%
BITU
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- -46.65%
- 6M
- -72.88%
- 1Y
- -55.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGQ vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGQ vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
AGQ
BITU
AGQ vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGQ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | -0.61 | +2.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | -0.59 | +2.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.93 | +0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | -0.67 | +2.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | -1.29 | +6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGQ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | -0.61 | +2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.32 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGQ and BITU is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AGQ vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.08%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 78.08% | 50.23% | 0.12% |
Drawdowns
AGQ vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -77.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and BITU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGQ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.16% | -77.76% | -20.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.21% | -77.76% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.72% | -76.14% | -7.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.83% | -31.36% | -48.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.27% | 40.50% | -12.23% |
Volatility
AGQ vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 34.37% compared to Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) at 26.02%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGQ | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.37% | 26.02% | +8.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.42% | 74.12% | +58.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.90% | 90.32% | +27.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.01% | 99.57% | -26.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.67% | 99.57% | -34.90% |