AGO vs. QQQM
AGO (Assured Guaranty Ltd.) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, AGO returned 10.98%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AGO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGO achieves a -17.78% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
AGO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- -17.78%
- 6M
- -16.82%
- 1Y
- -12.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
AGO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGO Assured Guaranty Ltd. | -17.78% | 1.44% | 22.08% | 22.52% | 26.20% | 62.33% | 13.77% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGO and QQQM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.30 |
The correlation between AGO and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
AGO
QQQM
AGO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.45 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 3.53 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 13.52 | -15.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 2.65 | -3.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.82 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.85 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
AGO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGO and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.18% | -35.04% | -55.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.84% | -11.96% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.83% | -22.70% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.23% | -35.04% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.37% | -0.20% | -21.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.81% | -8.25% | -11.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | 3.11% | +4.47% |
Volatility
AGO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) has a higher volatility of 12.34% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that AGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGO | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.34% | 4.48% | +7.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 12.05% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.54% | 15.91% | +5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 22.24% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 22.12% | +11.85% |
Dividends
AGO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
AGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGO Assured Guaranty Ltd. | 1.97% | 1.51% | 1.38% | 1.50% | 1.61% | 1.75% | 2.54% | 1.47% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 1.38% | 1.82% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGO has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGO dropped -90.18% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGO and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer