PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGO vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGO achieves a -17.78% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


AGO

1D
-0.92%
1M
-10.00%
YTD
-17.78%
6M
-16.82%
1Y
-12.05%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
12.53%

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AGO
Assured Guaranty Ltd.
-17.78%1.44%22.08%22.52%26.20%62.33%13.77%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between AGO and QQQM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.30

The correlation between AGO and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGO
AGO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGO Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGOQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.45

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

3.53

-4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

13.52

-15.11

AGO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGOQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

2.65

-3.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.82

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.85

-0.67

Drawdowns

AGO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGO and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGOQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.18%

-35.04%

-55.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.84%

-11.96%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.83%

-22.70%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.23%

-35.04%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.37%

-0.20%

-21.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.81%

-8.25%

-11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

3.11%

+4.47%

Volatility

AGO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) has a higher volatility of 12.34% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that AGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGOQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.34%

4.48%

+7.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

12.05%

+4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

15.91%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.33%

22.24%

+5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

22.12%

+11.85%

Dividends

AGO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

AGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGO
Assured Guaranty Ltd.
1.97%1.51%1.38%1.50%1.61%1.75%2.54%1.47%1.67%1.68%1.38%1.82%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGO has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGO dropped -90.18% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGO and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer