AGMI vs. BOTT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AGMI (Themes Silver Miners ETF) and BOTT (Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGMI is a Silver fund tracking the STOXX Global Silver Mining Index, while BOTT is a Robotics fund tracking the Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AGMI returned 79.34% vs 35.34% for BOTT. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

AGMI vs. BOTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGMI achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly lower than BOTT's 0.20% return.

AGMI

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -3.98%
• 6M: -15.79%
• YTD: -5.79%
• 1Y: 79.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 52.43%

BOTT

• 1D: 3.86%
• 1M: -12.37%
• 6M: -23.52%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 1Y: 35.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	$51.45K	$87.98K	$154.46K
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	$875.37K	$970.67K	$1.59M

AGMI vs. BOTT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	-5.79%	176.11%	-0.74%
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.20%	55.56%	7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between AGMI and BOTT is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024	0.43

AGMI vs. BOTT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AGMI	BOTT
Basic Materials	99.7%	-
Technology	0.1%	20.1%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	40.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AGMI vs. BOTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGMI

AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 54
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BOTT

BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 32
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGMI vs. BOTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) and Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGMI	BOTT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	0.85	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	1.41	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.16	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	0.92	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.55	2.23	+2.32

AGMI vs. BOTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the BOTT Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGMI and BOTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AGMI vs. BOTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGMI drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum BOTT drawdown of -38.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGMI and BOTT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGMI	BOTT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.67%	-38.54%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.67%	-38.54%	+2.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.01%	-32.94%	+0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.70%	-8.17%	-2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.50%	15.88%	+1.62%

Volatility

AGMI vs. BOTT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) is 12.91%, while Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF (BOTT) has a volatility of 14.73%. This indicates that AGMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGMI	BOTT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.91%	14.73%	-1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.91%	31.00%	+9.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.00%	41.83%	+11.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.92%	34.77%	+10.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.92%	34.77%	+10.15%

AGMI vs. BOTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AGMI and BOTT have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

AGMI vs. BOTT - Dividend Comparison

AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than BOTT's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AGMI Themes Silver Miners ETF	4.70%	4.43%	1.81%
BOTT Themes Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.13%	0.14%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGMI and BOTT in my portfolio?

AGMI and BOTT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AGMI or BOTT?

BOTT has higher volatility (14.73%) compared to AGMI (12.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGMI dropped -35.67% vs BOTT's -38.54%.

Which ETF is better, AGMI or BOTT?

On 1-year performance, AGMI leads with 79.34% vs 35.34% for BOTT. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, AGMI has been the lower-risk option at 12.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AGMI or BOTT?

Over the 1-year period, AGMI has performed better with a 79.34% return vs 35.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGMI or BOTT?

AGMI and BOTT have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGMI or BOTT?

AGMI has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.13% for BOTT.

What is the main difference between AGMI and BOTT?

AGMI is categorized as Silver, while BOTT is Robotics. AGMI tracks STOXX Global Silver Mining Index, while BOTT tracks Solactive Global Humanoid Robotics Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.