PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGGA vs. TMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGGA vs. TMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGGA achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than TMV's 1.44% return.


AGGA

1D
0.06%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMV

1D
-1.17%
1M
-6.25%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.97%
1Y
-1.80%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
20.39%
10Y*
-0.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGGA vs. TMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AGGA and TMV is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

-0.81

The correlation between AGGA and TMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGGA vs. TMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGGA
AGGA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AGGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TMV
TMV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGGA vs. TMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AGGATMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.01

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

-0.08

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

-0.16

+11.53

AGGA vs. TMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGGA Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the TMV Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGGA and TMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AGGA vs. TMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGGA drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum TMV drawdown of -98.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGA and TMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGGATMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-98.96%

+97.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-21.62%

+20.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-96.06%

+95.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-86.61%

+86.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

11.09%

-10.72%

Volatility

AGGA vs. TMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF (AGGA) is 0.77%, while Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X (TMV) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that AGGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGGATMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

6.55%

-5.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

19.56%

-17.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16%

28.25%

-26.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.24%

47.05%

-44.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.24%

44.38%

-42.14%

AGGA vs. TMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGGA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TMV's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

AGGA vs. TMV - Dividend Comparison

AGGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than TMV's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGA
Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF
4.25%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMV
Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bear 3X
2.70%2.85%3.41%3.87%0.00%0.00%0.37%1.60%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGGA and TMV have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMV has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to AGGA (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGGA dropped -1.47% vs TMV's -98.96%.

On 1-year performance, AGGA leads with 4.16% vs -1.80% for TMV. On fees, AGGA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AGGA has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGGA has performed better with a 4.16% return vs -1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGGA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for TMV.

AGGA has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 2.70% for TMV.

AGGA is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while TMV is Leveraged Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AGGA and 1.04% for TMV.

AGGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGGA and TMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer