AGG vs. IJH
AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AGG returned 1.57%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for IJH. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. AGG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
AGG vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed IJH with an annualized return of 1.57%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.
AGG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
IJH
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 15.48%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 25.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
AGG vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.52% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 15.48% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGG and IJH is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2003 | -0.10 |
The correlation between AGG and IJH shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGG vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
AGG
IJH
AGG vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGG | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.95 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 10.80 | -5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGG vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGG | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.43% | -55.07% | +36.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -8.83% | +6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.11% | -24.10% | +17.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -24.10% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.43% | -42.18% | +23.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | 0.00% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -7.56% | +4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 2.41% | -1.47% |
Volatility
AGG vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is 1.37%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that AGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGG | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 5.09% | -3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 11.73% | -8.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 15.89% | -12.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 19.79% | -13.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 21.20% | -15.79% |
AGG vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AGG vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than IJH's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.98% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGG and IJH have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IJH has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to AGG (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGG dropped -18.43% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.56% vs 1.57% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IJH.
AGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 1.17% for IJH.
AGG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for AGG and 0.05% for IJH.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGG and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer