AGG vs. EMB
AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while EMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AGG returned 1.57%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for EMB. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AGG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMB.
Performance
AGG vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGG achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than EMB's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, AGG has underperformed EMB with an annualized return of 1.57%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively higher 3.39% annualized return.
AGG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
EMB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 10.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
AGG vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.52% | 7.19% | 1.31% | 5.65% | -13.02% | -1.77% | 7.48% | 8.46% | 0.09% | 3.55% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 2.29% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 5.42% | 15.48% | -5.47% | 10.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGG and EMB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, AGG and EMB have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGG vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank
AGG
EMB
AGG vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGG | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.41 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 10.28 | -5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGG vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGG drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGG and EMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGG | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.43% | -34.70% | +16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -4.51% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.11% | -7.95% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.82% | -28.74% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.43% | -28.74% | +10.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | 0.00% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -5.05% | +2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 1.06% | -0.12% |
Volatility
AGG vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is 1.37%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that AGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGG | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 2.02% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 4.66% | -1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 5.67% | -1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.09% | 9.76% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 9.96% | -4.55% |
AGG vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGG vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than EMB's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.98% | 3.89% | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.72% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.03% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGG and EMB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMB has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to AGG (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGG dropped -18.43% vs EMB's -34.70%.
On 10-year performance, EMB leads with 3.39% vs 1.57% for AGG. On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMB has performed better with a 3.39% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMB.
EMB has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 3.98% for AGG.
AGG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while EMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, while EMB tracks JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for AGG and 0.39% for EMB.
EMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGG and EMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer