AGEM vs. ROAM
AGEM (abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF) and ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. AGEM is actively managed, while ROAM is passively managed. Over the past year, AGEM returned 63.11% vs 51.96% for ROAM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGEM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ROAM.
Performance
AGEM vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGEM achieves a 31.54% return, which is significantly higher than ROAM's 26.83% return.
AGEM
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 8.91%
- YTD
- 31.54%
- 6M
- 33.66%
- 1Y
- 63.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROAM
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 26.83%
- 6M
- 28.99%
- 1Y
- 51.96%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
AGEM vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF | 31.54% | 29.81% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 26.83% | 26.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGEM and ROAM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.86 |
The correlation between AGEM and ROAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGEM vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank
AGEM
ROAM
AGEM vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGEM | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.63 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 5.27 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.79 | 19.91 | -2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGEM | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15 | 3.50 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.41 | 0.38 | +2.03 |
Drawdowns
AGEM vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGEM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGEM and ROAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGEM | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -45.47% | +29.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -9.92% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.60% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -11.13% | +8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 2.62% | +0.94% |
Volatility
AGEM vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) has a higher volatility of 9.15% compared to Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) at 6.41%. This indicates that AGEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGEM | ROAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.15% | 6.41% | +2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 12.76% | +4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 14.93% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 15.23% | +6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 17.87% | +3.64% |
AGEM vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGEM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGEM vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison
AGEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than ROAM's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF | 1.71% | 1.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 2.50% | 3.17% | 4.15% | 5.40% | 5.23% | 4.22% | 3.04% | 3.55% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGEM and ROAM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGEM has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to ROAM (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGEM dropped -15.58% vs ROAM's -45.47%.
On 1-year performance, AGEM leads with 63.11% vs 51.96% for ROAM. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, ROAM has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AGEM has performed better with a 63.11% return vs 51.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AGEM.
ROAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.71% for AGEM.
They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AGEM and 0.44% for ROAM.
ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 3.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGEM and ROAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer