AGEM vs. AMUN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AGEM (abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by abrdn, while AMUN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn. Both are actively managed. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. AGEM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMUN.

Performance

AGEM vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGEM achieves a 24.99% return, which is significantly higher than AMUN's 1.48% return.

AGEM

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 14.22%
• YTD: 24.99%
• 1Y: 45.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 39.71%

AMUN

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: 1.17%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF	$1.02M	$702.44K	$818.78K
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	$21.67K	$39.49K	$71.65K

AGEM vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF	24.99%	3.24%
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	1.48%	0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AGEM and AMUN is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

AGEM vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AGEM

AGEM Risk / Return Rank: 80
AGEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AGEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AGEM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AGEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AGEM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

AMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AGEM vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGEM	AMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.15	—	—

Drawdowns

AGEM vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGEM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGEM and AMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGEM	AMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.58%	-0.61%	-14.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.03%	0.00%	-7.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.64%	-0.07%	-2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGEM	AMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.33%	0.94%	+23.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.59%	0.94%	+22.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.59%	0.94%	+22.65%

AGEM vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGEM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGEM vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison

AGEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than AMUN's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF	1.94%	1.80%
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF	2.13%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGEM and AMUN in my portfolio?

AGEM and AMUN have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AGEM or AMUN?

On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGEM or AMUN?

AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AGEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGEM or AMUN?

AMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.94% for AGEM.

What is the main difference between AGEM and AMUN?

AGEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AMUN is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AGEM and 0.25% for AMUN.