AGEM vs. AMUN
AGEM (abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF) and AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by abrdn, while AMUN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. AGEM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMUN.
Performance
AGEM vs. AMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGEM achieves a 27.99% return, which is significantly higher than AMUN's 1.25% return.
AGEM
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 27.99%
- 6M
- 28.48%
- 1Y
- 56.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGEM vs. AMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF | 27.99% | 3.24% |
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.25% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGEM and AMUN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGEM vs. AMUN — Risk / Return Rank
AGEM
AMUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AGEM vs. AMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGEM | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGEM vs. AMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGEM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, which is greater than AMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGEM and AMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGEM | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -0.61% | -14.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.79% | 0.00% | -4.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.30% | -0.08% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | — | — |
Volatility
AGEM vs. AMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGEM | AMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 0.98% | +21.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 0.98% | +21.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 0.98% | +21.92% |
AGEM vs. AMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGEM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGEM vs. AMUN - Dividend Comparison
AGEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than AMUN's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF | 2.33% | 1.80% |
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.88% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AGEM and AMUN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AGEM.
AGEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.88% for AMUN.
AGEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AMUN is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AGEM and 0.25% for AMUN.
Find the right allocation for AGEM and AMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer