PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGEM vs. QEMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGEM vs. QEMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGEM vs. QEMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGEM achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than QEMM's 4.84% return.


AGEM

1D
3.43%
1M
-9.42%
YTD
6.11%
6M
10.23%
1Y
42.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QEMM

1D
2.95%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
4.84%
6M
8.64%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
7.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGEM vs. QEMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGEM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QEMM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AGEM vs. QEMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGEM
AGEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AGEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AGEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

QEMM
QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGEM vs. QEMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGEMQEMMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.54

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

2.16

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.56

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.05

9.33

+2.72

AGEM vs. QEMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the QEMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGEM and QEMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGEMQEMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.54

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.26

+1.39

Correlation

The correlation between AGEM and QEMM is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AGEM vs. QEMM - Dividend Comparison

AGEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than QEMM's 4.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGEM
abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF
2.12%1.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF
4.67%4.90%5.17%4.88%4.07%2.35%2.48%3.05%2.86%2.11%2.03%2.14%

Drawdowns

AGEM vs. QEMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGEM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum QEMM drawdown of -36.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGEM and QEMM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AGEMQEMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-36.89%

+21.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-10.40%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.97%

-7.76%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-10.77%

+8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.85%

+0.63%

Volatility

AGEM vs. QEMM - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) at 9.11%. This indicates that AGEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QEMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AGEMQEMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.85%

9.11%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

12.57%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

17.21%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

14.81%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

16.73%

+3.63%