AGEM vs. SGOL
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL).
AGEM and SGOL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGEM is an actively managed fund by abrdn. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. SGOL is a passively managed fund by abrdn that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Sep 9, 2009.
Performance
AGEM vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGEM vs. SGOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF | 6.11% | 29.81% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 8.62% | 46.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGEM achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than SGOL's 8.62% return.
AGEM
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -9.42%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 42.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGOL
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 21.22%
- 1Y
- 49.63%
- 3Y*
- 33.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.84%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGEM vs. SGOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGEM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGEM vs. SGOL — Risk / Return Rank
AGEM
SGOL
AGEM vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGEM | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 1.81 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 2.25 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 2.71 | +0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 10.02 | +2.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGEM | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.81 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.65 | 0.58 | +1.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGEM and SGOL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AGEM vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison
AGEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AGEM abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF | 2.12% | 1.80% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AGEM vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGEM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum SGOL drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGEM and SGOL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGEM | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -45.51% | +29.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -19.14% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.97% | -13.21% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -18.46% | +16.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 5.17% | -1.69% |
Volatility
AGEM vs. SGOL - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) have volatilities of 10.85% and 10.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGEM | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.85% | 10.97% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.03% | 24.00% | -8.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 27.51% | -6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 17.63% | +2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 15.84% | +4.52% |