PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGEM vs. SGOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AGEM vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AGEM vs. SGOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGEM achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than SGOL's 8.62% return.


AGEM

1D
3.43%
1M
-9.42%
YTD
6.11%
6M
10.23%
1Y
42.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGOL

1D
3.77%
1M
-10.99%
YTD
8.62%
6M
21.22%
1Y
49.63%
3Y*
33.23%
5Y*
21.84%
10Y*
14.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGEM vs. SGOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGEM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AGEM vs. SGOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGEM
AGEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AGEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AGEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOL
SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGEM vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGEMSGOLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.81

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

2.25

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.33

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.71

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.05

10.02

+2.03

AGEM vs. SGOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SGOL Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGEM and SGOL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGEMSGOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.81

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.58

+1.07

Correlation

The correlation between AGEM and SGOL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AGEM vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison

AGEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

AGEM vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGEM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum SGOL drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGEM and SGOL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AGEMSGOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-45.51%

+29.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-19.14%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.97%

-13.21%

+2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-18.46%

+16.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

5.17%

-1.69%

Volatility

AGEM vs. SGOL - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets Dividend Active ETF (AGEM) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) have volatilities of 10.85% and 10.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AGEMSGOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.85%

10.97%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

24.00%

-8.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

27.51%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.36%

17.63%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

15.84%

+4.52%