AFTY vs. DRGN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFTY is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China A 50, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. AFTY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.

Performance

AFTY vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AFTY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRGN

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 5.53%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 6M: 18.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	16.56%	26.41%

Return for Risk

AFTY vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFTY	DRGN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.58	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AFTY	DRGN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-7.05%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.93%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AFTY	DRGN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	34.85%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	34.85%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	34.85%	—

AFTY vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFTY vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.23%	2.08%	1.84%	1.48%	7.96%	1.85%	6.62%	1.19%	16.76%
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	1.04%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AFTY or DRGN?

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFTY or DRGN?

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFTY or DRGN?

DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.

What is the main difference between AFTY and DRGN?

AFTY is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.39% for DRGN.