AFRM vs. LU
AFRM (Affirm Holdings, Inc.) and LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) are both stocks. AFRM operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while LU operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, AFRM returned -0.54%/yr vs -40.59%/yr for LU. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AFRM vs. LU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRM achieves a -11.10% return, which is significantly higher than LU's -48.05% return.
AFRM
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- -11.10%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 11.94%
- 3Y*
- 52.28%
- 5Y*
- -0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
LU
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -28.88%
- YTD
- -48.05%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -52.50%
- 3Y*
- -22.60%
- 5Y*
- -40.59%
- 10Y*
- —
AFRM vs. LU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | -11.10% | 22.22% | 23.93% | 408.17% | -90.38% | 10.63% |
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | -48.05% | 7.11% | 73.97% | -58.03% | -60.48% | -62.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRM and LU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
AFRM:
$3.20B
LU:
CN¥31.92B
AFRM:
$2.00B
LU:
CN¥13.50B
AFRM:
$908.84M
LU:
-CN¥1.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRM vs. LU — Risk / Return Rank
AFRM
LU
AFRM vs. LU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFRM | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.80 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.78 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | -1.40 | +1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFRM vs. LU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRM drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, roughly equal to the maximum LU drawdown of -96.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRM and LU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRM | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.71% | -96.68% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.86% | -69.77% | +15.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.85% | -69.77% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.71% | -94.84% | +0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.73% | -95.42% | +34.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.65% | -78.39% | +9.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.04% | 38.81% | -11.77% |
Volatility
AFRM vs. LU - Volatility Comparison
Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) at 11.70%. This indicates that AFRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRM | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | 11.70% | +6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.83% | 34.40% | +9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.85% | 53.01% | +7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.23% | 76.61% | +19.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.46% | 76.27% | +19.19% |
Dividends
AFRM vs. LU - Dividend Comparison
Neither AFRM nor LU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 101.26% | 11.60% | 26.29% |
Financials
AFRM vs. LU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Affirm Holdings, Inc. and Lufax Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRM and LU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFRM has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to LU (11.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFRM dropped -94.71% vs LU's -96.68%.
AFRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFRM and LU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer