PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AFRM vs. SPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AFRM and SPY is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

AFRM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
80.38%
7.12%
AFRM
SPY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFRM:

0.50

SPY:

2.03

Sortino Ratio

AFRM:

1.35

SPY:

2.71

Omega Ratio

AFRM:

1.15

SPY:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

AFRM:

0.46

SPY:

3.09

Martin Ratio

AFRM:

1.44

SPY:

12.94

Ulcer Index

AFRM:

27.28%

SPY:

2.01%

Daily Std Dev

AFRM:

78.60%

SPY:

12.78%

Max Drawdown

AFRM:

-94.71%

SPY:

-55.19%

Current Drawdown

AFRM:

-65.46%

SPY:

-2.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRM achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 1.14% return.


AFRM

YTD

-4.42%

1M

-20.11%

6M

80.38%

1Y

42.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SPY

YTD

1.14%

1M

-1.98%

6M

7.12%

1Y

26.42%

5Y*

14.07%

10Y*

13.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFRM vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFRM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFRM is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFRM is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFRM is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFRM is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFRM is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFRM is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SPY is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SPY is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SPY is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SPY is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SPY is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SPY is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFRM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AFRM, currently valued at 0.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.502.03
The chart of Sortino ratio for AFRM, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.352.71
The chart of Omega ratio for AFRM, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.151.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for AFRM, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.463.09
The chart of Martin ratio for AFRM, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.001.4412.94
AFRM
SPY

The current AFRM Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFRM and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.50
2.03
AFRM
SPY

Dividends

AFRM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

AFRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%1.87%

Drawdowns

AFRM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRM drawdown since its inception was -94.71%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRM and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-65.46%
-2.14%
AFRM
SPY

Volatility

AFRM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) has a higher volatility of 19.37% compared to SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.01%. This indicates that AFRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
19.37%
5.01%
AFRM
SPY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab