PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFOS vs. WZRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFOS vs. WZRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 36.79% return, which is significantly higher than WZRD's -74.01% return.


AFOS

1D
0.72%
1M
8.55%
YTD
36.79%
6M
36.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WZRD

1D
1.73%
1M
-25.12%
YTD
-74.01%
6M
-74.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. WZRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
36.79%37.10%
WZRD
Opportunistic Trader ETF
-74.01%-10.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and WZRD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFOS vs. WZRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Opportunistic Trader ETF (WZRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFOS vs. WZRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. WZRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum WZRD drawdown of -79.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and WZRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFOSWZRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-79.25%

+67.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-78.89%

+78.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-26.85%

+25.44%

Volatility

AFOS vs. WZRD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFOSWZRDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.17%

56.33%

-35.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

56.33%

-35.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.17%

56.33%

-35.16%

AFOS vs. WZRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than WZRD's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFOS vs. WZRD - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than WZRD's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%
WZRD
Opportunistic Trader ETF
4.95%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFOS and WZRD have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WZRD.

WZRD has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and Opportunistic Trader. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 1.07% for WZRD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFOS and WZRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer