AFOS vs. FNDB
AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFOS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by ARS Investment Partners, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFOS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.
Performance
AFOS vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 32.24% return, which is significantly higher than FNDB's 15.31% return.
AFOS
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 36.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 15.31%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 33.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
AFOS vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.24% | 36.15% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 15.31% | 12.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFOS and FNDB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFOS vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
AFOS
FNDB
AFOS vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFOS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.35 | 0.79 | +3.56 |
Drawdowns
AFOS vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and FNDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFOS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -38.17% | +26.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | 0.00% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -3.66% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
AFOS vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFOS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.14% | 10.73% | +9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 15.36% | +4.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 17.48% | +2.66% |
AFOS vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFOS vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than FNDB's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFOS and FNDB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.
FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
AFOS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.25% for FNDB.
Find the right allocation for AFOS and FNDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer