AFMC vs. VFMV
AFMC (First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFMC returned 10.49%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for VFMV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFMC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
AFMC vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFMC achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 8.53% return.
AFMC
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
AFMC vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 16.54% | 10.23% | 19.06% | 21.46% | -15.55% | 25.75% | 5.87% | 2.56% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.53% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFMC and VFMV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between AFMC and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFMC vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFMC
VFMV
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
AFMC
VFMV
Industrials
AFMC
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
AFMC
VFMV
Healthcare
AFMC
VFMV
Financial Services
AFMC
VFMV
Real Estate
AFMC
VFMV
Basic Materials
AFMC
VFMV
-
Consumer Defensive
AFMC
VFMV
Energy
AFMC
VFMV
Communication Services
AFMC
VFMV
Utilities
AFMC
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFMC vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
AFMC
VFMV
AFMC vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFMC | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.18 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.40 | 8.57 | +3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFMC | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.49 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.84 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.69 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
AFMC vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFMC drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMC and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFMC | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.14% | -33.64% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -6.00% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.99% | -10.35% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | -15.41% | -9.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.02% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -3.64% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 1.53% | +0.74% |
Volatility
AFMC vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.09%. This indicates that AFMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFMC | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 2.09% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 6.30% | +4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 8.80% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 11.75% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 14.25% | +8.68% |
AFMC vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFMC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFMC vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
AFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | 0.78% | 0.96% | 0.64% | 0.87% | 1.42% | 0.84% | 1.05% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFMC and VFMV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFMC has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFMC dropped -42.14% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, AFMC leads with 10.49% vs 9.82% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AFMC has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AFMC.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.78% for AFMC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AFMC and 0.13% for VFMV.
AFMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFMC and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer