PortfoliosLab logo
AFMC vs. PAMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AFMC and PAMC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

AFMC vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFMC:

0.37

PAMC:

-0.13

Sortino Ratio

AFMC:

0.56

PAMC:

-0.21

Omega Ratio

AFMC:

1.07

PAMC:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

AFMC:

0.27

PAMC:

-0.19

Martin Ratio

AFMC:

0.81

PAMC:

-0.53

Ulcer Index

AFMC:

7.34%

PAMC:

9.45%

Daily Std Dev

AFMC:

21.18%

PAMC:

20.34%

Max Drawdown

AFMC:

-42.14%

PAMC:

-27.03%

Current Drawdown

AFMC:

-9.14%

PAMC:

-15.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMC achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than PAMC's -7.61% return.


AFMC

YTD

-0.31%

1M

4.87%

6M

-8.48%

1Y

7.71%

3Y*

10.92%

5Y*

14.26%

10Y*

N/A

PAMC

YTD

-7.61%

1M

4.29%

6M

-14.38%

1Y

-2.53%

3Y*

10.18%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AFMC vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFMC vs. PAMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFMC is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFMC is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFMC is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFMC is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFMC is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFMC is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PAMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PAMC is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PAMC is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PAMC is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PAMC is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PAMC is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PAMC is 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFMC vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AFMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the PAMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMC and PAMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AFMC vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison

AFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than PAMC's 0.95% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
AFMC
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
0.82%0.64%0.87%1.42%0.84%1.05%0.29%
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
0.95%0.97%0.69%1.29%0.36%0.30%0.00%

Drawdowns

AFMC vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMC drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, which is greater than PAMC's maximum drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMC and PAMC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AFMC vs. PAMC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) at 4.33%. This indicates that AFMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...