AFMC vs. QRSVX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX).

AFMC is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019. QRSVX is a passively managed fund by FPA that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value. It was launched on Jun 13, 2002.

Performance

AFMC vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AFMC vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF	3.16%	10.23%	19.06%	21.46%	-15.55%	25.75%	3.25%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	3.75%	13.37%	10.72%	16.04%	-9.14%	23.16%	2.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFMC achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than QRSVX's 3.75% return.

AFMC

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: -4.78%
• YTD: 3.16%
• 6M: 4.11%
• 1Y: 17.62%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: —

QRSVX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -5.97%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 3.39%
• 1Y: 20.65%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFMC vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFMC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.

QRSVX

FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

AFMC

First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF

Return for Risk

AFMC vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFMC

AFMC Risk / Return Rank: 55
AFMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
AFMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AFMC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
AFMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
AFMC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

QRSVX

QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 62
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFMC vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AFMC	QRSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.08	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.66	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.23	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.45	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.07	6.11	-0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AFMC vs. QRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the QRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFMC and QRSVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AFMC	QRSVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	1.08	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.48	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.63	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between AFMC and QRSVX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AFMC vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison

AFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than QRSVX's 4.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AFMC First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF	0.88%	0.96%	0.64%	0.87%	1.42%	0.84%	1.05%	0.29%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	4.29%	4.45%	4.86%	2.56%	2.07%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AFMC vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFMC drawdown since its inception was -42.14%, which is greater than QRSVX's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFMC and QRSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFMC	QRSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.14%	-20.59%	-21.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.18%	-12.93%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.40%	-20.59%	-4.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.77%	-7.08%	+1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	-5.03%	-2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	3.06%	-0.01%

Volatility

AFMC vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) at 4.26%. This indicates that AFMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFMC	QRSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	4.26%	+1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.36%	10.73%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.43%	19.44%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.97%	17.43%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.11%	17.53%	+5.58%