QRSVX vs. FMDE
QRSVX (FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both funds - QRSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value, while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. QRSVX is passively managed, while FMDE is actively managed. Over the past year, QRSVX returned 37.39% vs 19.98% for FMDE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRSVX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.
Performance
QRSVX vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRSVX achieves a 26.22% return, which is significantly higher than FMDE's 10.32% return.
QRSVX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 26.22%
- 6M
- 24.08%
- 1Y
- 37.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- —
FMDE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QRSVX vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 26.22% | 13.37% | 10.72% | 10.26% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 10.32% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRSVX and FMDE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between QRSVX and FMDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRSVX vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank
QRSVX
FMDE
QRSVX vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QRSVX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.25 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | 2.41 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.66 | 9.44 | +8.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QRSVX vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRSVX drawdown since its inception was -20.59%, roughly equal to the maximum FMDE drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRSVX and FMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRSVX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.59% | -21.10% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.93% | -8.33% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.37% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -2.61% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.12% | +0.12% |
Volatility
QRSVX vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRSVX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 4.64% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 10.52% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 14.03% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 16.17% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 16.17% | +1.30% |
QRSVX vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRSVX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRSVX vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison
QRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than FMDE's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.10% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 3.52% | 4.45% | 4.86% | 2.56% | 2.07% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRSVX and FMDE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMDE has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to QRSVX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRSVX dropped -20.59% vs FMDE's -21.10%.
QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRSVX and FMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer