PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRSVX vs. VSCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRSVX vs. VSCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRSVX achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly lower than VSCAX's 31.37% return.


QRSVX

1D
1.54%
1M
4.28%
YTD
26.06%
6M
23.35%
1Y
39.26%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*

VSCAX

1D
2.24%
1M
4.82%
YTD
31.37%
6M
29.13%
1Y
60.07%
3Y*
30.99%
5Y*
21.19%
10Y*
17.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRSVX vs. VSCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
26.06%13.37%10.72%16.04%-9.14%23.16%2.50%
VSCAX
Invesco Small Cap Value Fund
31.37%17.70%24.54%22.84%4.31%36.34%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between QRSVX and VSCAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020

0.88

The correlation between QRSVX and VSCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRSVX vs. VSCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRSVX
QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCAX
VSCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VSCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRSVX vs. VSCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) and Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QRSVXVSCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

5.26

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.59

18.31

-0.72

QRSVX vs. VSCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the VSCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRSVX and VSCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QRSVX vs. VSCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRSVX drawdown since its inception was -20.59%, smaller than the maximum VSCAX drawdown of -57.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRSVX and VSCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRSVXVSCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.59%

-57.77%

+37.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-11.43%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-25.29%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.59%

-25.29%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.39%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-8.88%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.27%

-1.03%

Volatility

QRSVX vs. VSCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) is 4.80%, while Invesco Small Cap Value Fund (VSCAX) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that QRSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRSVXVSCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

8.95%

-4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

17.04%

-6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

21.72%

-6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

23.33%

-5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

26.80%

-9.33%

QRSVX vs. VSCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRSVX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than VSCAX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRSVX vs. VSCAX - Dividend Comparison

QRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than VSCAX's 7.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
3.53%4.45%4.86%2.56%2.07%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSCAX
Invesco Small Cap Value Fund
7.02%9.22%7.90%4.93%10.12%16.90%0.30%2.53%28.45%16.65%1.71%11.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRSVX and VSCAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSCAX has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to QRSVX (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRSVX dropped -20.59% vs VSCAX's -57.77%.

VSCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRSVX and VSCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer