PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFK vs. TEMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFK vs. TEMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly lower than TEMGX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, AFK has underperformed TEMGX with an annualized return of 5.50%, while TEMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.92% annualized return.


AFK

1D
0.76%
1M
-6.98%
YTD
-1.38%
6M
6.19%
1Y
34.47%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
5.50%

TEMGX

1D
-2.50%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
6.74%
6M
7.19%
1Y
13.86%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFK vs. TEMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFK
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF
-1.38%74.71%12.10%-12.11%-17.31%3.00%4.26%9.90%-19.55%28.22%
TEMGX
Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund
6.74%5.43%3.42%16.62%-24.00%15.06%13.23%24.50%-18.10%24.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AFK and TEMGX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2008

0.58

The correlation between AFK and TEMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFK vs. TEMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFK
AFK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFK Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TEMGX
TEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFK vs. TEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFKTEMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.16

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

3.82

+1.38

AFK vs. TEMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the TEMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFK and TEMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFKTEMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.00

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.01

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.34

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.45

-0.45

Drawdowns

AFK vs. TEMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, smaller than the maximum TEMGX drawdown of -68.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and TEMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFKTEMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-68.70%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.54%

-12.71%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.54%

-22.84%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.87%

-36.20%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.33%

-41.61%

-11.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.68%

-2.87%

-10.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.03%

-11.95%

-20.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.65%

3.86%

+2.79%

Volatility

AFK vs. TEMGX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX) at 4.94%. This indicates that AFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFKTEMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

4.94%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.95%

11.36%

+11.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.07%

14.86%

+11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.18%

17.35%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

17.35%

+4.86%

AFK vs. TEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than TEMGX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFK vs. TEMGX - Dividend Comparison

AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than TEMGX's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFK
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF
1.03%1.02%0.00%2.27%3.59%4.17%3.91%6.34%1.71%1.99%2.67%2.16%
TEMGX
Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund
4.39%4.69%2.98%1.09%3.14%10.66%2.58%2.16%9.12%3.65%0.33%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFK and TEMGX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFK has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to TEMGX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFK dropped -62.46% vs TEMGX's -68.70%.

AFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFK and TEMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer