TEMGX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
TEMGX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 31, 1981. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
TEMGX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEMGX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMGX Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund | -2.53% | 5.43% | 3.42% | 16.62% | -24.00% | 15.06% | 13.23% | 24.50% | -18.10% | 24.94% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMGX achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMGX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.
TEMGX
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- -2.53%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 9.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.90%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEMGX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMGX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEMGX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
TEMGX
FGIAX
TEMGX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEMGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 1.79 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 2.30 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.36 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 2.73 | -2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | 12.62 | -10.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEMGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.79 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.80 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.42 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMGX and FGIAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TEMGX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
TEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMGX Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund | 4.81% | 4.69% | 2.98% | 1.09% | 3.14% | 10.66% | 2.58% | 2.16% | 9.12% | 3.65% | 0.33% | 0.21% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
TEMGX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMGX drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMGX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -49.35% | -19.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -8.29% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.20% | -21.08% | -15.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.61% | -38.02% | -3.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -3.06% | -7.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -7.22% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 1.79% | +2.24% |
Volatility
TEMGX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund (TEMGX) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that TEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEMGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 4.15% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 7.07% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 12.28% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 13.08% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 15.17% | +2.08% |