AEYE vs. CLMB
AEYE (AudioEye, Inc.) and CLMB (Climb Global Solutions) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AEYE in Software - Application, CLMB in Electronics & Computer Distribution. Over the past 10 years, AEYE returned 5.90%/yr vs 20.66%/yr for CLMB. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEYE vs. CLMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEYE achieves a -27.63% return, which is significantly lower than CLMB's -10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AEYE has underperformed CLMB with an annualized return of 5.90%, while CLMB has yielded a comparatively higher 20.66% annualized return.
AEYE
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -27.63%
- 6M
- -44.47%
- 1Y
- -43.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- -16.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
CLMB
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- 16.20%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 6M
- -14.93%
- 1Y
- -10.96%
- 3Y*
- 25.60%
- 5Y*
- 27.38%
- 10Y*
- 20.66%
AEYE vs. CLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEYE AudioEye, Inc. | -27.63% | -34.32% | 180.63% | 41.51% | -45.44% | -72.82% | 450.75% | -45.15% | 128.00% | 7.14% |
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | -10.96% | -18.40% | 133.60% | 76.59% | -8.29% | 88.47% | 22.14% | 70.90% | -37.08% | -7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEYE and CLMB is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013 | 0.09 |
The correlation between AEYE and CLMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (10 years) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AEYE:
$90.09M
CLMB:
$416.78M
AEYE:
-$0.30
CLMB:
$1.16
AEYE:
2.19
CLMB:
0.60
AEYE:
28.34
CLMB:
3.52
AEYE:
$41.13M
CLMB:
$696.85M
AEYE:
$32.07M
CLMB:
$108.37M
AEYE:
-$1.08M
CLMB:
$35.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEYE vs. CLMB — Risk / Return Rank
AEYE
CLMB
AEYE vs. CLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEYE | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.01 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.21 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.43 | -0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEYE | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | -0.21 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.60 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 | 0.51 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.22 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
AEYE vs. CLMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEYE drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, which is greater than CLMB's maximum drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEYE and CLMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEYE | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.86% | -89.12% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.87% | -53.40% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.95% | -53.40% | -30.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.00% | -53.40% | -30.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.81% | -53.40% | -39.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.44% | -36.08% | -47.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.10% | -32.23% | -43.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.80% | 25.64% | +10.16% |
Volatility
AEYE vs. CLMB - Volatility Comparison
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) has a higher volatility of 18.83% compared to Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) at 10.08%. This indicates that AEYE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEYE | CLMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.83% | 10.08% | +8.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.74% | 40.66% | +7.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.99% | 52.04% | +8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.11% | 45.77% | +36.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.59% | 40.86% | +63.73% |
Dividends
AEYE vs. CLMB - Dividend Comparison
AEYE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEYE AudioEye, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLMB Climb Global Solutions | 0.37% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 1.24% | 2.16% | 1.94% | 3.56% | 4.20% | 6.80% | 4.07% | 3.64% | 3.71% |
Financials
AEYE vs. CLMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AudioEye, Inc. and Climb Global Solutions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AEYE vs. CLMB - Profitability Comparison
AEYE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.25M and revenue of 10.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.
CLMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a gross profit of 26.50M and revenue of 182.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.
AEYE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88M and revenue of 10.55M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.8%.
CLMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported an operating income of 3.88M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
AEYE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported a net income of -2.11M and revenue of 10.55M, resulting in a net margin of -20.0%.
CLMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Climb Global Solutions reported a net income of 3.33M and revenue of 182.38M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEYE and CLMB have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEYE has higher volatility (18.83%) compared to CLMB (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEYE dropped -97.86% vs CLMB's -89.12%.
CLMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AEYE and CLMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer