PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEYE vs. FUBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEYE vs. FUBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) and fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEYE achieves a -27.63% return, which is significantly higher than FUBO's -66.40% return.


AEYE

1D
-3.60%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
-27.63%
6M
-44.47%
1Y
-43.36%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
-16.59%
10Y*
5.90%

FUBO

1D
3.46%
1M
-18.06%
YTD
-66.40%
6M
-70.80%
1Y
-76.42%
3Y*
-21.50%
5Y*
-49.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEYE vs. FUBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
-27.63%-34.32%180.63%41.51%-45.44%-72.82%450.75%-45.15%128.00%15.38%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
-66.40%100.00%-60.38%82.76%-88.79%-44.57%214.43%31.93%-27.42%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AEYE and FUBO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2017

0.18

The correlation between AEYE and FUBO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEYE:

$90.09M

FUBO:

$312.07M

EPS

AEYE:

-$0.30

FUBO:

-$1.31

PS Ratio

AEYE:

2.19

FUBO:

0.08

PB Ratio

AEYE:

28.34

FUBO:

0.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEYE:

$41.13M

FUBO:

$3.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEYE:

$32.07M

FUBO:

$233.58M

EBITDA (TTM)

AEYE:

-$1.08M

FUBO:

$35.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEYE vs. FUBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEYE
AEYE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AEYE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEYE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEYE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
AEYE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEYE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FUBO
FUBO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FUBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUBO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FUBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUBO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEYE vs. FUBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) and fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEYEFUBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.74

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.91

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

-1.56

+0.34

AEYE vs. FUBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEYE Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is higher than the FUBO Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEYE and FUBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEYEFUBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

-1.06

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.35

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.14

+0.07

Drawdowns

AEYE vs. FUBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEYE drawdown since its inception was -97.86%, roughly equal to the maximum FUBO drawdown of -98.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEYE and FUBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEYEFUBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.86%

-98.92%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.87%

-84.17%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.95%

-86.78%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.00%

-97.89%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.44%

-98.73%

+15.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.10%

-85.60%

+9.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.80%

49.12%

-13.32%

Volatility

AEYE vs. FUBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) is 18.83%, while fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) has a volatility of 28.28%. This indicates that AEYE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEYEFUBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.83%

28.28%

-9.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.74%

57.74%

-10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.99%

72.36%

-11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.11%

144.54%

-62.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.59%

171.29%

-66.70%

Dividends

AEYE vs. FUBO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AEYE nor FUBO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AEYE vs. FUBO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AudioEye, Inc. and fuboTV Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
10.55M
1.57B
(AEYE) Total Revenue
(FUBO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEYE vs. FUBO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AudioEye, Inc. and fuboTV Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
78.2%
0
Portfolio components
AEYE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.25M and revenue of 10.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.2%.

FUBO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AEYE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88M and revenue of 10.55M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.8%.

FUBO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AEYE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AudioEye, Inc. reported a net income of -2.11M and revenue of 10.55M, resulting in a net margin of -20.0%.

FUBO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported a net income of -5.52M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEYE and FUBO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUBO has higher volatility (28.28%) compared to AEYE (18.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEYE dropped -97.86% vs FUBO's -98.92%.

AEYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEYE and FUBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer