PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AES vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AES vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The AES Corporation (AES) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return. Over the past 10 years, AES has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 6.68%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


AES

1D
0.20%
1M
3.01%
YTD
5.07%
6M
9.90%
1Y
50.59%
3Y*
-5.64%
5Y*
-6.44%
10Y*
6.68%

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AES vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AES
The AES Corporation
5.07%18.26%-30.40%-30.88%21.69%5.94%22.16%42.14%39.02%-2.69%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AES and XLE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between AES and XLE has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AES vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AES
AES Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AES vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AESXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.75

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

10.92

-5.80

AES vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AES Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AES and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AESXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.21

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.79

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.35

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.31

-0.18

Drawdowns

AES vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AESXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.65%

-71.26%

-27.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.98%

-12.05%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.33%

-20.14%

-33.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.43%

-26.04%

-37.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

-66.81%

+3.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.00%

-6.15%

-55.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.02%

-17.98%

-39.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.91%

4.14%

+5.77%

Volatility

AES vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The AES Corporation (AES) is 1.51%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that AES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AESXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

8.25%

-6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.70%

16.58%

+9.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.94%

20.53%

+22.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.83%

26.02%

+11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.06%

29.59%

+6.47%

Dividends

AES vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AES
The AES Corporation
4.78%4.91%5.36%3.45%2.20%2.48%2.44%2.74%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


AES and XLE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to AES (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AES dropped -98.65% vs XLE's -71.26%.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AES and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer