AEP.L vs. EQNR
AEP.L (Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc) and EQNR (Equinor ASA) are both stocks. AEP.L operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while EQNR operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 5 years, AEP.L returned 21.77%/yr vs 19.83%/yr for EQNR. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEP.L vs. EQNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AEP.L is traded in GBp, while EQNR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQNR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEP.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than EQNR's 59.67% return.
AEP.L
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -23.19%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 96.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
EQNR
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 59.67%
- 6M
- 62.06%
- 1Y
- 58.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 19.83%
- 10Y*
- —
AEP.L vs. EQNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEP.L Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc | 11.24% | 124.03% | -0.64% | -12.84% | 11.63% | 23.64% | 1.64% | 1.54% | -24.96% |
EQNR Equinor ASA | 59.67% | 0.03% | -14.51% | -5.74% | 57.50% | 66.11% | -16.11% | -4.76% | -16.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEP.L and EQNR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
AEP.L:
£591.04M
EQNR:
$91.58B
AEP.L:
£4.05
EQNR:
$2.15
AEP.L:
3.76
EQNR:
17.03
AEP.L:
0.37
EQNR:
0.53
AEP.L:
0.71
EQNR:
0.90
AEP.L:
1.02
EQNR:
2.10
AEP.L:
£838.60M
EQNR:
$104.23B
AEP.L:
£214.57M
EQNR:
$36.46B
AEP.L:
£230.87M
EQNR:
$39.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEP.L vs. EQNR — Risk / Return Rank
AEP.L
EQNR
AEP.L vs. EQNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) and Equinor ASA (EQNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEP.L | EQNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.19 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 5.52 | +8.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEP.L | EQNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.57 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.60 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.30 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
AEP.L vs. EQNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEP.L drawdown since its inception was -68.81%, which is greater than EQNR's maximum drawdown of -62.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEP.L and EQNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEP.L | EQNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.81% | -62.90% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.66% | -18.40% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.66% | -31.73% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.66% | -39.65% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.86% | -14.08% | -18.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.58% | -23.51% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.92% | 10.61% | -3.69% |
Volatility
AEP.L vs. EQNR - Volatility Comparison
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a higher volatility of 30.61% compared to Equinor ASA (EQNR) at 11.38%. This indicates that AEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEP.L | EQNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.61% | 11.38% | +19.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.71% | 30.98% | +6.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.58% | 37.29% | +7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.03% | 33.30% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 35.71% | -1.62% |
Dividends
AEP.L vs. EQNR - Dividend Comparison
AEP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than EQNR's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEP.L Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc | 4.31% | 4.80% | 1.81% | 4.78% | 0.51% | 0.10% | 0.07% | 0.41% | 0.52% | 0.39% |
EQNR Equinor ASA | 4.10% | 7.66% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 3.30% | 2.13% | 4.32% | 5.07% | 3.26% | 0.00% |
Financials
AEP.L vs. EQNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc and Equinor ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AEP.L vs. EQNR - Profitability Comparison
AEP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported a gross profit of 63.11M and revenue of 235.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
EQNR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a gross profit of 12.33B and revenue of 27.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.
AEP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported an operating income of 53.57M and revenue of 235.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.7%.
EQNR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported an operating income of 8.80B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.
AEP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported a net income of 42.42M and revenue of 235.87M, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.
EQNR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinor ASA reported a net income of 3.11B and revenue of 27.82B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEP.L and EQNR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AEP.L and EQNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer