AEP.L vs. CLS
AEP.L (Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. AEP.L operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, AEP.L returned 15.17%/yr vs 46.65%/yr for CLS. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEP.L vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AEP.L is traded in GBp, while CLS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEP.L achieves a 19.71% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 55.56% return. Over the past 10 years, AEP.L has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 15.17%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 46.65% annualized return.
AEP.L
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -7.87%
- YTD
- 19.71%
- 6M
- 18.84%
- 1Y
- 120.34%
- 3Y*
- 30.58%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
CLS
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 55.56%
- 6M
- 47.77%
- 1Y
- 280.46%
- 3Y*
- 218.77%
- 5Y*
- 123.73%
- 10Y*
- 46.65%
AEP.L vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEP.L Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc | 19.71% | 124.03% | -0.64% | -12.84% | 11.63% | 23.64% | 1.65% | 1.53% | -25.84% | 14.42% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 55.56% | 197.45% | 220.74% | 146.82% | 13.30% | 39.22% | -5.28% | -9.29% | -11.35% | -19.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEP.L and CLS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
AEP.L:
£636.02M
CLS:
$53.01B
AEP.L:
£4.05
CLS:
$8.28
AEP.L:
4.04
CLS:
55.30
AEP.L:
0.39
CLS:
0.74
AEP.L:
0.76
CLS:
3.84
AEP.L:
1.09
CLS:
25.26
AEP.L:
£838.60M
CLS:
$13.81B
AEP.L:
£214.57M
CLS:
$1.60B
AEP.L:
£230.87M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEP.L vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
AEP.L
CLS
AEP.L vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEP.L | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 4.05 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | 3.45 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.46 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 9.07 | -4.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.46 | 22.10 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEP.L | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 4.05 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 2.22 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.96 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.60 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
AEP.L vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEP.L drawdown since its inception was -73.29%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEP.L and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEP.L | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.29% | -79.21% | +5.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.34% | -31.16% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.34% | -55.33% | +25.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.46% | -55.33% | +21.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.83% | -79.21% | +17.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.75% | -2.76% | -24.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.39% | -22.34% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | 12.76% | -7.17% |
Volatility
AEP.L vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a higher volatility of 31.52% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 22.11%. This indicates that AEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEP.L | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.52% | 22.11% | +9.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.23% | 51.78% | -14.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.38% | 69.83% | -25.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.29% | 56.19% | -22.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.41% | 48.83% | -14.42% |
Dividends
AEP.L vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
AEP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEP.L Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc | 4.01% | 4.80% | 1.81% | 4.78% | 0.51% | 0.10% | 0.07% | 0.40% | 0.53% | 0.39% | 0.26% | 0.56% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AEP.L vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AEP.L vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
AEP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported a gross profit of 63.11M and revenue of 235.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
AEP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported an operating income of 53.57M and revenue of 235.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.7%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
AEP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported a net income of 42.42M and revenue of 235.87M, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEP.L and CLS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AEP.L and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer